Martin Karen W, Ernst E
Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK.
Mycoses. 2004 Apr;47(3-4):87-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2003.00951.x.
Traditional medicine has made use of many different plant extracts for treatment of fungal infections and some of these have been tested for in vitro antifungal activity. This systematic review evaluates antifungal herbal preparations that have been tested in controlled clinical trials. Four electronic databases were searched for controlled clinical trials of antifungal herbal medicines. Data were extracted in a standardized manner by two independent reviewers and are reviewed narratively. Seven clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. Tea tree oil preparations were tested in four randomized clinical trials and some positive outcomes were attributed to the intervention in all trials. Solanum species (two trials) and oil of bitter orange preparations (one trial) were compared with conventional treatments. In all cases encouraging results were reported. There are few controlled clinical trials of herbal antifungal medicines. The most thoroughly clinically tested is tea tree oil, which holds some promise. All herbal remedies require further investigation in rigorous clinical trials.
传统医学利用了许多不同的植物提取物来治疗真菌感染,其中一些已进行了体外抗真菌活性测试。本系统评价评估了在对照临床试验中进行过测试的抗真菌草药制剂。检索了四个电子数据库,以查找抗真菌草药的对照临床试验。由两名独立评审员以标准化方式提取数据,并进行叙述性综述。七项临床试验符合我们的纳入标准。茶树油制剂在四项随机临床试验中进行了测试,所有试验中均有一些积极结果归因于该干预措施。将茄属植物(两项试验)和苦橙油制剂(一项试验)与传统治疗方法进行了比较。在所有案例中均报告了令人鼓舞的结果。抗真菌草药的对照临床试验很少。临床测试最全面的是茶树油,它有一定前景。所有草药疗法都需要在严格的临床试验中进一步研究。