Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮中抗核小体、抗染色质、抗双链DNA及抗组蛋白抗体反应性

Anti-nucleosome, anti-chromatin, anti-dsDNA and anti-histone antibody reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

González Concepción, Garcia-Berrocal Belen, Herráez Oscar, Navajo José Alejandro, González-Buitrago José Manuel

机构信息

Servicio de Bioquímica, Laboratorio de Autoinmunidad, Hospital Universitario, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004 Mar;42(3):266-72. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.049.

Abstract

Anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies play a key role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in patients with SLE in relation to patients with positive nuclear antibodies and healthy controls. We measured anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in 70 patients with SLE, 35 antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and 35 blood donors. All antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We obtained the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) for each autoantibody. Likewise, we obtained the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each autoantibody. The highest AUC was obtained for anti-nucleosome (0.898) and the lowest AUC for a kit for anti-dsDNA (0.725). Stratification of the control group (ANA-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and blood donors) produced significant changes in the AUCs; all AUCs decreased when ANA-positive patients without autoimmune disease were considered as controls and all AUCs increased when blood donors were considered as controls. These effects were less marked in anti-dsDNA antibodies. We observed discrepancies between kits (anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin and two for anti-dsDNA). The highest sensitivity for SLE was obtained for anti-nucleosome antibodies (86%) and the highest specificity was obtained for anti-dsDNA antibodies (90%). In conclusion, anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin kits show different degrees of clinical accuracy due to the cut-off selected by the manufacturer. Once the kits with the best performance and the optimal cut-offs have been selected, anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies provide similar information in established SLE.

摘要

抗核小体(抗染色质)抗体在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的发病机制中起关键作用。本研究的目的是确定SLE患者中抗核小体(抗染色质)抗体、抗双链DNA(dsDNA)抗体和抗组蛋白抗体相对于核抗体阳性患者和健康对照的临床意义。我们检测了70例SLE患者、35例无自身免疫性疾病的抗核抗体(ANA)阳性受试者和35名献血者的抗核小体(抗染色质)抗体、抗dsDNA抗体和抗组蛋白抗体。所有抗体均通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行检测。我们获得了每种自身抗体的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)。同样,我们获得了每种自身抗体的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性似然比。抗核小体的AUC最高(0.898),抗dsDNA试剂盒的AUC最低(0.725)。对照组(无自身免疫性疾病的ANA阳性受试者和献血者)的分层使AUC产生了显著变化;当将无自身免疫性疾病的ANA阳性患者视为对照时,所有AUC均降低,而当将献血者视为对照时,所有AUC均升高。这些效应在抗dsDNA抗体中不太明显。我们观察到试剂盒之间(抗核小体和抗染色质以及两种抗dsDNA试剂盒)存在差异。SLE的最高敏感性由抗核小体抗体获得(86%),最高特异性由抗dsDNA抗体获得(90%)。总之,由于制造商选择的临界值不同,抗核小体和抗染色质试剂盒显示出不同程度的临床准确性。一旦选择了性能最佳和临界值最优的试剂盒,抗核小体抗体和抗dsDNA抗体在确诊的SLE中提供相似的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验