Shabana Adel A, El-Ghawet Atef E, Machaly Shereen A, Abu Hashim Ekbal M, El-Kady Basma A, Shaat Reham
Rheumatology and Rehabilitation department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;28(6):673-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1130-2. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
There has been a renewed interest in anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies in the last few years. To assess the prevalence of anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies in patients with systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to correlate serum levels of these antibodies with clinical features of the disease, the presence of anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies in 38 patients with SLE was investigated by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To determine the specificity of these antibodies, 15 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 15 patients with systemic sclerosis, and 15 normal controls were also tested. Sensitivity of anti-chromatin antibodies in SLE patients was 89.5% and specificity was 80.0%, while sensitivity of anti-histone antibodies was 92.1% and specificity was 82.2%. Significant associations were found between the levels of anti-chromatin antibodies and arthritis, malar rash, oral ulcer, pulmonary affection (P < 0.05) also, lupus nephritis (P < 0.01), and disease activity score as measured by SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI; P < 0.001). Significant association was found between anti-histone antibodies and fatigue (P < 0.05). The incidence of positive anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies was significantly higher than that of anti-dsDNA antibodies in early stage of the disease. We conclude that anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies are both sensitive and specific for SLE and could be a useful addition to the laboratory tests that can help in the diagnosis of SLE. Anti-chromatin antibodies seem to be a promising marker useful in early diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in SLE patients especially in patients who are negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies.
在过去几年中,人们对抗染色质和抗组蛋白抗体重新产生了兴趣。为了评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中抗染色质和抗组蛋白抗体的患病率,并将这些抗体的血清水平与疾病的临床特征相关联,采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法对38例SLE患者中抗染色质和抗组蛋白抗体的存在情况进行了研究。为了确定这些抗体的特异性,还对15例类风湿关节炎患者、15例系统性硬化症患者和15名正常对照进行了检测。SLE患者中抗染色质抗体的敏感性为89.5%,特异性为80.0%,而抗组蛋白抗体的敏感性为92.1%,特异性为82.2%。发现抗染色质抗体水平与关节炎、颧部皮疹、口腔溃疡、肺部病变(P<0.05)、狼疮性肾炎(P<0.01)以及以SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)衡量的疾病活动评分(P<0.001)之间存在显著关联。发现抗组蛋白抗体与疲劳之间存在显著关联(P<0.05)。在疾病早期,抗染色质和抗组蛋白抗体阳性的发生率显著高于抗双链DNA抗体。我们得出结论,抗染色质和抗组蛋白抗体对SLE既敏感又特异,可作为有助于SLE诊断的实验室检测的有益补充。抗染色质抗体似乎是一种有前景的标志物,尤其在抗双链DNA抗体阴性的患者中,可用于SLE患者的早期诊断和疾病活动评估。