Harris Debra S, Mendelson John E, Lin Emil T, Upton Robert A, Jones Reese T
Drug Dependence Research Center, Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0984, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(5):329-40. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443050-00005.
Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combinations are effective pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence, but doses are considerably greater than analgesic doses. Because dose-related buprenorphine opioid agonist effects may plateau at higher doses, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of expected therapeutic doses.
The first experiment examined a range of sublingual buprenorphine solution doses with an ascending dose design (n = 12). The second experiment examined a range of doses of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets along with one dose of buprenorphine alone tablets with a balanced crossover design (n = 8).
Twenty nondependent, opioid-experienced volunteers.
Subjects in the solution experiment received sublingual buprenorphine solution in single ascending doses of 4, 8, 16 and 32 mg. Subjects in the tablet experiment received sublingual tablets combining buprenorphine 4, 8 and 16 mg with naloxone at a 4 : 1 ratio or buprenorphine 16 mg alone, given as single doses. Plasma buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects were measured for 48-72 hours after administration.
Buprenorphine concentrations increased with dose, but not proportionally. Dose-adjusted areas under the concentration-time curve for buprenorphine 32 mg solution, buprenorphine 1 6 mg tablet and buprenorphine/naloxone 16/4 mg tablet were only 54 +/- 16%, 70 +/- 25% and 72 +/- 17%, respectively, of that of the 4 mg dose of sublingual solution or tablet. No differences were found between dose strengths for most subjective and physiological effects. Pupil constriction at 48 hours after administration of solution did, however, increase with dose. Subjects reported greater intoxication with the 32 mg solution dose, even though acceptability of the 4 mg dose was greatest. Naloxone did not change the bioavailability or effects of the buprenorphine 16 mg tablet.
Less than dose-proportional increases in plasma buprenorphine concentrations may contribute to the observed plateau for most pharmacodynamic effects as the dose is increased.
丁丙诺啡及丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组合是治疗阿片类药物依赖的有效药物疗法,但所需剂量远高于镇痛剂量。由于丁丙诺啡的阿片类激动剂效应在较高剂量时可能趋于平稳,我们评估了预期治疗剂量的药代动力学和药效学。
第一个实验采用剂量递增设计,研究了一系列舌下含服丁丙诺啡溶液的剂量(n = 12)。第二个实验采用平衡交叉设计,研究了一系列舌下含服丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮片的剂量以及一剂单独的丁丙诺啡片(n = 8)。
20名有阿片类药物使用经验的非依赖志愿者。
溶液实验中的受试者接受4、8、16和32 mg单次递增剂量的舌下含服丁丙诺啡溶液。片剂实验中的受试者接受以4:1比例将4、8和16 mg丁丙诺啡与纳洛酮混合的舌下片或单独的16 mg丁丙诺啡片,均为单次给药。给药后48 - 72小时测量血浆丁丙诺啡、去甲丁丙诺啡和纳洛酮浓度以及药效学效应。
丁丙诺啡浓度随剂量增加,但不成比例。32 mg溶液、16 mg片剂和16/4 mg丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮片剂的丁丙诺啡浓度 - 时间曲线下剂量调整面积分别仅为4 mg剂量的舌下溶液或片剂的54±16%、70±25%和72±17%。大多数主观和生理效应在不同剂量强度之间未发现差异。然而,溶液给药后48小时的瞳孔收缩随剂量增加。尽管4 mg剂量的可接受性最高,但受试者报告32 mg溶液剂量的中毒反应更强。纳洛酮未改变1