Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者概况:血糖控制的极端情况

Profiles of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the extremes of glycemic control.

作者信息

Savoca Margaret R, Miller Carla K, Quandt Sara A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Georgia Prevention Institute, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30901, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2655-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.031.

Abstract

For people with diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a measure of blood glucose control and an indication of the risk of developing diabetes complications. However, a given HbA1c value does not provide information about the diabetes self-management practices or philosophies of individuals in poor (HbA1c > 8.0%) or excellent (HbA1c < 6.5%) control. To contrast the experiences and attitudes of people at the extremes of glycemic control, interviews were conducted among 44 individuals (40-65 years old) diagnosed with diabetes for over 1 year. The participants were identified based upon their HbA1c value from a larger sample of people with type 2 diabetes that included African Americans, women, and persons with low income. Narratives were analyzed using a case-based and conceptually clustered matrix approach. The life course concept (life histories and natural transitions in roles and responsibilities across the life span) and the explanatory model of illness (individuals' beliefs about the causes, consequences, and treatment of a disease) provided the framework for the interview guide and the analysis of the narratives. Two self-management philosophy groups emerged from participants with excellent control (Committed [n = 15] and Tentative [ n = 7]) and three groups were identified among the poorly controlled group (Hopeful [n = 8], Hassled [n = 6 ], and Overwhelmed [n = 8]). Perseverance, coping skills, and age at diagnosis were life course concepts that distinguished participants within these groups. From the explanatory model of illness, beliefs about the cause of the disease, physical changes, and accepting the consequence of the disease influenced differences in these self-management philosophies. The profiles of people at the extremes of glycemic control can help those treating people with diabetes or seeking to improve self-management interventions understand differences in self-management philosophies and concentrate on specific issues hindering self-care control.

摘要

对于糖尿病患者而言,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是衡量血糖控制情况的指标,也是发生糖尿病并发症风险的一项指征。然而,给定的HbA1c值并不能提供有关糖化血红蛋白控制不佳(HbA1c>8.0%)或控制良好(HbA1c<6.5%)的个体的糖尿病自我管理实践或理念的信息。为了对比血糖控制处于极端情况的人群的经历和态度,我们对44名(年龄在40 - 65岁之间)确诊糖尿病超过1年的个体进行了访谈。这些参与者是从一个更大的2型糖尿病患者样本中根据其HbA1c值确定的,该样本包括非裔美国人、女性和低收入人群。使用基于案例和概念性聚类矩阵的方法对访谈内容进行了分析。生命历程概念(生命史以及一生中角色和责任的自然转变)和疾病解释模型(个体对疾病的病因、后果和治疗的信念)为访谈指南和访谈内容分析提供了框架。从控制良好的参与者中出现了两个自我管理理念组(坚定组[n = 15]和试探组[n = 7]),在控制不佳的组中确定了三个组(充满希望组[n = 8]、烦恼组[n = 6]和不堪重负组[n = 8])。毅力、应对技巧和确诊年龄是区分这些组内参与者的生命历程概念。从疾病解释模型来看,对疾病病因、身体变化以及接受疾病后果的信念影响了这些自我管理理念的差异。血糖控制处于极端情况的人群概况有助于那些治疗糖尿病患者或寻求改善自我管理干预措施的人了解自我管理理念的差异,并专注于阻碍自我护理控制的具体问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验