Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, CHU Félix Guyon, Saint-Denis, Réunion, France.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Jul 29;7:357-67. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S36369. eCollection 2014.
While therapeutic patient education is now recognized as essential for optimizing the control of chronic diseases and patient well-being, adherence to treatment and medical recommendations is still a matter of debate. In type 2 diabetes, the nonadherence to therapy, estimated at more than 40%, is perceived as a barrier for improving the prognosis despite recent therapeutic advances. Interventional studies have barely begun to demonstrate the effectiveness of technical and behavioral actions. The aim of this review is to question the concept of adherence in terms of therapeutic education based on quantitative and qualitative data. The research on therapeutic education has shown the effectiveness of structured actions in type 2 diabetes, but adherence is rarely an end point in randomized trials. A positive but inconsistent or moderate effect of education actions on adherence has been shown in heterogeneous studies of varying quality. Program types, outlines, theoretical bases, and curricula to set up for action effectiveness are still being discussed. Qualitative studies, including sociological studies, provide a useful and constructive focus on this perspective. Adherence is a soft and flexible tool available to the patient in his/her singular chronic disease trajectory, and as such, integrates into individual therapeutic strategies, including socio-cultural interactions, beyond the medical explanation of the disease and the patient. Four key elements for the development of structured therapeutic education are discussed: 1) the access to health literacy, 2) the contextualization of education activities, 3) the long-term chronic dimension of self-management, and 4) the organizational aspects of health and care. Rather than focusing the objective on behavioral changes, structured therapeutic education actions should attempt to provide tools and resources aimed at helping individuals to manage their disease in their own context on a long-term basis, by developing health literacy and relational and organizational aspects of the health professionals and system.
尽管治疗性患者教育现在被认为是优化慢性病控制和患者福祉的关键,但治疗和医疗建议的依从性仍然是一个有争议的问题。在 2 型糖尿病中,尽管最近有了治疗上的进步,但治疗的不依从率估计超过 40%,被认为是改善预后的障碍。干预性研究几乎刚刚开始证明技术和行为措施的有效性。本综述的目的是根据定量和定性数据,从治疗教育的角度质疑依从性的概念。治疗教育的研究表明,在 2 型糖尿病中,结构化行动是有效的,但在随机试验中,依从性很少是终点。在不同质量的异质研究中,教育行动对依从性的积极但不一致或中等影响已被证明。方案类型、大纲、理论基础和行动有效性的课程仍在讨论中。定性研究,包括社会学研究,为这一观点提供了有用和建设性的焦点。依从性是患者在其独特的慢性疾病轨迹中可用的灵活工具,并且作为一种工具,它整合到了包括社会文化互动在内的个体化治疗策略中,超越了对疾病和患者的医学解释。讨论了发展结构化治疗性教育的四个关键要素:1)获得健康素养,2)教育活动的情境化,3)自我管理的长期慢性维度,4)健康和护理的组织方面。结构化治疗性教育行动不应将目标集中在行为改变上,而应尝试提供工具和资源,旨在帮助个人在长期内根据自己的情况管理疾病,发展健康素养以及卫生专业人员和系统的关系和组织方面。