Shaffer Michele L, Chinchilli Vernon M
Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, A210, Penn State College of Medicine, 600 Centerview Drive, Suite 2200, Hershey, PA 17033-0855, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2004 Apr 30;23(8):1215-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.1726.
During the course of a clinical trial, subjects may experience treatment failure. For ethical reasons, it is necessary to administer emergency or rescue medications for such subjects. However, the rescue medications may bias the set of response measurements. This bias is of particular concern if a subject has been randomized to the control group, and the rescue medications improve the subject's condition. The standard approach to analysing data from a clinical trial is to perform an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, wherein the data are analysed according to treatment randomization. Supplementary analyses may be performed in addition to the ITT analysis to account for the effect of treatment failures and rescue medications. A Bayesian, counterfactual approach, which uses the data augmentation (DA) algorithm, is proposed for supplemental analysis. A simulation study is conducted to compare the operating characteristics of this procedure with a likelihood-based, counterfactual approach based on the EM algorithm. An example from the Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) is used to illustrate the Bayesian procedure.
在临床试验过程中,受试者可能会出现治疗失败的情况。出于伦理原因,有必要为这些受试者使用急救或挽救药物。然而,挽救药物可能会使反应测量结果产生偏差。如果受试者被随机分配到对照组,而挽救药物改善了受试者的病情,这种偏差就会特别令人担忧。分析临床试验数据的标准方法是进行意向性分析(ITT),即根据治疗随机化情况对数据进行分析。除了ITT分析之外,还可以进行补充分析,以考虑治疗失败和挽救药物的影响。本文提出了一种使用数据增强(DA)算法的贝叶斯反事实方法用于补充分析。进行了一项模拟研究,以比较该方法与基于期望最大化(EM)算法的基于似然性的反事实方法的操作特征。使用哮喘临床研究网络(ACRN)的一个例子来说明贝叶斯方法。