Tancredi G, Quattrucci S, Scalercio F, De Castro G, Zicari A M, Bonci E, Cingolani S, Indinnimeo L, Midulla F
Paediatric Department, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena, 324-00161 Rome, Italy.
Eur Respir J. 2004 Apr;23(4):569-74. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00039704.
A simple exercise test would be useful for detecting exercise-induced asthma, a common problem in asthmatic children. The current study compared the 3-min step test with treadmill exercise for evaluating exercise-induced asthma in asthmatic children and assessed whether responses to both tests are influenced by baseline lung function and habitual physical activity. A series of 154 asthmatic children (84 male children; mean age 12.9 +/- 0.9 yrs) underwent a 3-min step-test and treadmill testing on different days within a week at least 24 h apart. Before both tests each subject did spirometry to obtain the baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). After both exercise challenges all subjects did serial spirometry and the lowest FEV1 recorded over time was used to calculate the fall in FEV1 expressed as a percentage of the measured pre-exercise (baseline) value (% fall in FEV1) and the area above the FEV1 curve (AAC0-30 min) expressed as a percentage of the pre-exercise value. Changes in both exercise variables were also analysed in percentile subgroups defined by questionnaire answers on habitual physical activity in hours. The mean % fall in FEV1 was significantly higher for treadmill exercise than for the step test (15.0 +/- 7.5 versus 11.7 +/- 5.9); and the AAC0-30 min was larger for treadmill than for the step test (-261.6 +/- 139.9% versus -197.3 +/- 105.0% min). In all subgroups defined by habitual physical activity the mean % fall in FEV1 decreased more after treadmill exercise than after the step test. After step test and treadmill exercise no significant correlation was found between % fall in FEV1 and baseline lung function, or between % fall in FEV1 among groups defined by habitual physical activity. Although the 3-min step test yields a lower % fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and a lower value of the area above the FEV1 curve than treadmill testing, it is a quick, economical, reproducible and portable alternative procedure for identifying exercise-induced asthma in outpatients and epidemiological studies. Baseline lung function and habitual physical activity have no influence on the amount or duration of exercise-induced asthma.
一项简单的运动测试对于检测运动诱发性哮喘很有用,这是哮喘儿童中常见的问题。本研究比较了3分钟阶梯试验和跑步机运动对评估哮喘儿童运动诱发性哮喘的效果,并评估了两种测试的反应是否受基线肺功能和习惯性身体活动的影响。154名哮喘儿童(84名男童;平均年龄12.9±0.9岁)在一周内不同日期、至少间隔24小时接受了3分钟阶梯试验和跑步机测试。在两项测试前,每个受试者都进行了肺活量测定以获得基线一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。在两项运动激发试验后,所有受试者都进行了系列肺活量测定,记录的随时间变化的最低FEV1用于计算FEV1下降率,以运动前(基线)测量值的百分比表示(FEV1下降百分比),以及FEV1曲线以上面积(AAC0 - 30分钟),以运动前值的百分比表示。还根据关于习惯性身体活动小时数的问卷答案定义的百分位子组分析了两个运动变量的变化。跑步机运动的FEV1平均下降百分比显著高于阶梯试验(15.0±7.5对11.7±5.9);跑步机运动的AAC0 - 30分钟大于阶梯试验(-261.6±139.9%对-197.3±105.0%分钟)。在由习惯性身体活动定义的所有子组中,跑步机运动后FEV1平均下降百分比的下降幅度大于阶梯试验后。在阶梯试验和跑步机运动后,未发现FEV1下降百分比与基线肺功能之间、或由习惯性身体活动定义的组间FEV1下降百分比之间存在显著相关性。尽管3分钟阶梯试验的一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降百分比和FEV1曲线以上面积值低于跑步机测试,但它是一种快速、经济、可重复且便携的替代方法,可用于门诊患者和流行病学研究中识别运动诱发性哮喘。基线肺功能和习惯性身体活动对运动诱发性哮喘的程度或持续时间没有影响。