Ricco Giuseppina, Tomei M C M Concetta, Ramadori Roberto, Laera Giuseppe
Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, CNR Via F. De Blasio, 5 Bari 70123, Italy.
Water Res. 2004 Apr;38(8):2103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.020.
The toxicity of four xenobiotic compounds 3,5-dichlorophenol, formaldehyde, 4-nitrophenol and dichloromethane, representative of industrial wastewater contaminants was evaluated by a simple respirometric procedure set up on the basis of OECD Method 209 and by the Microtox bioassay. Very good reproducibility was observed for both methods, the variation coefficients being in the range of 2-10% for the respirometric procedure and 6-15% for Microtox, values that can be considered very good for a biological method. Comparison of EC(50) data obtained with the two methods shows that in both cases 3,5-dichlorophenol is more toxic than other compounds investigated and dichloromethane has a very low toxicity value. Intermediate EC(50) values were found for the two other chemicals, formaldehyde and 4-nitrophenol. Moreover, the Microtox EC(50) values are generally lower (except for dichloromethane) than the respirometric ones: these differences could be explained by the fact that the Microtox method uses a pure culture of marine species and, therefore, should not necessarily be expected to behave like a community of activated sludge bacteria. In conclusion, both methods can be usefully applied for toxicity detection in wastewater treatment plants but it is advisable to take into account that Microtox is more sensitive than respirometry in estimating the acute toxicity effect on the biomass operating in the plant.
采用基于经合组织(OECD)209号方法建立的简易呼吸测定法以及微毒性生物测定法,对四种具有代表性的工业废水污染物——3,5 - 二氯苯酚、甲醛、4 - 硝基苯酚和二氯甲烷的毒性进行了评估。两种方法均具有很好的重现性,呼吸测定法的变异系数在2% - 10%范围内,微毒性生物测定法的变异系数在6% - 15%范围内,对于生物方法而言,这些数值可被视为非常好。两种方法所获得的半数效应浓度(EC(50))数据比较表明,在两种情况下,3,5 - 二氯苯酚均比其他所研究的化合物毒性更强,而二氯甲烷的毒性值非常低。另外两种化学物质甲醛和4 - 硝基苯酚的EC(50)值处于中间水平。此外,微毒性生物测定法的EC(50)值通常(二氯甲烷除外)低于呼吸测定法的EC(50)值:这些差异可以解释为微毒性生物测定法使用的是海洋物种的纯培养物,因此不一定表现得像活性污泥细菌群落。总之,两种方法均可有效地应用于污水处理厂的毒性检测,但需要考虑到在评估对处理厂中生物质的急性毒性效应时,微毒性生物测定法比呼吸测定法更为灵敏。