Application of Maastricht 2-2000 guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori among specialists and primary care physicians in israel: are we missing the malignant potential of Helicobacter pylori?

BACKGROUND

The Maastricht 2-2000 guidelines on the current management of Helicobacter pylori infection were recently adopted by the Israeli Gastroenterological Association.

GOAL

To determine the impact of these clinical guidelines on the current knowledge, attitudes, and management of H. pylori among primary care physicians, hospital internists, and gastroenterologists in Israel.

STUDY

Self-administered, voluntary, anonymous questionnaires were given personally to 229 physicians, 73 primary care physicians, 71 internists, and 85 gastroenterologists. The questions evaluated 4 main issues in the management of H. pylori: (1). the optimal diagnostic test, (2). indications for eradication, (3). combination and duration of triple therapy, and (4). the need for confirmation following eradication.

RESULTS

There were significant variations in the adherence of those recommendations among gastroenterologists, internists, and primary care physicians. Specifically, 94.1% of gastroenterologists and 88.9% of internists consider the urea breath test the test of choice for H. pylori diagnosis compared with 60.0% of the primary care physicians. Significant differences in the eradication indications for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, atrophic gastritis, functional dyspepsia, and concomitant use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were demonstrated among gastroenterologists and the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians may not be aware of important indications for diagnosis and eradication of H. pylori related to the risk of gastric malignancy or concomitant use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Public health agencies may need to increase penetration of the Maastricht 2000 recommendations to primary care physicians.