Pagnin Daniel, de Queiroz Valéria, Pini Stefano, Cassano Giovanni Battista
Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Biotechnology. University of Pisa, Italy.
J ECT. 2004 Mar;20(1):13-20. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200403000-00004.
This study analyzed the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in depression by means a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials that compared ECT with simulated ECT or placebo or antidepressant drugs and by a complementary meta-analytic review of nonrandomized controlled trials that compared ECT with antidepressants drugs. The review revealed a significant superiority of ECT in all comparisons: ECT versus simulated ECT, ECT versus placebo, ECT versus antidepressants in general, ECT versus TCAs and ECT versus MAOIs. The nonrandomized controlled trials also revealed a significant statistical difference in favor of ECT when confronted with antidepressants drugs. Data analyzed suggest that ECT is a valid therapeutic tool for treatment of depression, including severe and resistant forms.
本研究通过对比较电休克治疗(ECT)与模拟电休克、安慰剂或抗抑郁药物的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析,以及对比较ECT与抗抑郁药物的非随机对照试验进行补充荟萃分析,来分析ECT治疗抑郁症的疗效。该综述显示,在所有比较中ECT均具有显著优势:ECT与模拟电休克比较、ECT与安慰剂比较、ECT与一般抗抑郁药物比较、ECT与三环类抗抑郁药比较以及ECT与单胺氧化酶抑制剂比较。非随机对照试验也显示,与抗抑郁药物相比,ECT存在显著统计学差异。分析的数据表明,ECT是治疗抑郁症(包括重度和难治性抑郁症)的有效治疗工具。