Millet G P, Bentley D J
Laboratoire "Sport, Performance, Santé", Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Montpellier, France.
Int J Sports Med. 2004 Apr;25(3):191-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45259.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the physiological responses in cycling and the energy cost (EC) of running after cycling in elite junior (J (male) and J (female)) and senior (S (male) and S (female)) triathletes and to determine the relationship between laboratory physiological parameters and performance in an elite "standard" distance triathlon. Thirty-one elite triathletes competing at World Championship level (age: 23.4 +/- 4.8 y; height: 172.6 +/- 6.8 cm; body mass: 64.4 +/- 7.2 kg; V.O (2)max = 67.8 +/- 8.3 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)) comprising J (male) (n = 7), J (female) (n = 6), S (male) (n = 9) and S (female) (n = 9) athletes performed a laboratory trial that consisted of submaximal treadmill running (to determine EC), maximal then submaximal cycle ergometry (to determine the peak power output [PPO], V.O (2)max, the ventilation threshold [VT] and cycling economy) followed by an additional submaximal running bout. Swimming, cycling, running and overall race performance (min) over a standard event was also measured in the field. S (male) had a faster cycle, run and overall triathlon times than J (male). S (female) demonstrated a faster cycle and overall triathlon time than J (female). The V.O (2)max (74.7 +/- 5.7 vs. 74.3 +/- 4.4 and 60.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 61.0 +/- 5.0 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)) and cycling economy (72.5 +/- 4.5 vs. 73.8 +/- 4.3 and 75.6 +/- 4.5 vs. 79.8 +/- 9.8 W x l (-1) x min (-1)) were similar between the junior and senior, in both male and female triathletes. However, S (female) possessed a significantly higher PPO than J (female). S (male) had a higher VT (%V.O (2)max) than J (male) whereas the VT was similar in J (female) and S (female). There were no significant differences in EC change from the first to the second running bout between J (male) and S (male), whereas, in contrast, J (female) exhibited a significantly (p < 0.05) higher difference in EC than S (female). When all subjects were pooled, the overall triathlon time (min) was significantly correlated to V.O (2)max (r = -0.80; p < 0.001) and PPO (W) (r = -0.85; p < 0.001) in cycle ergometry. In conclusion, elite senior triathletes can be distinguished from their younger (junior) counterparts, mainly by a higher PPO in cycling and a lower increase in the whole body energy cost of running after cycling in female and by a higher ventilatory threshold in male triathletes.
本研究的目的是比较精英青少年(J(男)和J(女))和成年(S(男)和S(女))铁人三项运动员在骑行后的生理反应以及跑步的能量消耗(EC),并确定实验室生理参数与精英“标准”距离铁人三项赛成绩之间的关系。31名参加世界锦标赛级别的精英铁人三项运动员(年龄:23.4±4.8岁;身高:172.6±6.8厘米;体重:64.4±7.2千克;最大摄氧量=67.8±8.3毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹),包括J(男)(n = 7)、J(女)(n = 6)、S(男)(n = 9)和S(女)(n = 9)运动员进行了一项实验室测试,该测试包括次最大强度跑步机跑步(以确定EC)、最大强度然后次最大强度的自行车测功(以确定峰值功率输出[PPO]、最大摄氧量、通气阈值[VT]和骑行经济性),随后进行额外的次最大强度跑步回合。还在实地测量了标准赛事中的游泳、骑行、跑步和总比赛成绩(分钟)。S(男)的骑行、跑步和总铁人三项赛时间比J(男)快。S(女)的骑行和总铁人三项赛时间比J(女)快。青少年和成年男性、女性铁人三项运动员的最大摄氧量(74.7±5.7与74.3±4.4以及60.1±1.8与61.0±5.0毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)和骑行经济性(72.5±4.5与73.8±4.3以及75.6±4.5与79.8±9.8瓦·升⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)相似。然而,S(女)的PPO明显高于J(女)。S(男)的VT(%最大摄氧量)高于J(男),而J(女)和S(女)的VT相似。J(男)和S(男)从第一次到第二次跑步回合的EC变化没有显著差异,而相比之下,J(女)的EC差异比S(女)显著更高(p < 0.05)。当所有受试者合并时,总铁人三项赛时间(分钟)与自行车测功中的最大摄氧量(r = -0.80;p < 0.001)和PPO(瓦)(r = -0.85;p <