Tesser John, Fleischmann Roy, Dore Robin, Bennett Ralph, Solinger Alan, Joh Tenshang, Modafferi Dennis, Schechtman Joy
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Arizona Rheumatology Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85015-2160, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2004 Apr;31(4):649-54.
To examine the safety of anakinra when added to a background of standard rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications in patients with RA with active disease.
This analysis further evaluates data from the first 6 months of a blinded, placebo controlled safety trial that had a subsequent 30 month, open label portion (not reported here). Patients with RA with a wide range of comorbid conditions, disease activity, and background medications were randomly assigned in a 4:1 allocation ratio to treatment with anakinra 100 mg or placebo administered daily by injection. Safety was assessed by comparing adverse event profiles between anakinra and placebo patients according to concomitant medications received.
Anakinra patients (n = 1116) showed no difference in the incidence of upper respiratory infections or overall serious adverse events compared with placebo patients (n = 283). The anakinra group had more injection site reactions (72.6% vs 32.9% in placebo) and a small increase in serious infections (2.1% vs 0.4% in placebo). Anakinra's safety profile did not differ in patients receiving antihypertensive, antidiabetic, or statin drugs.
This study indicates that anakinra has a good safety profile in patients typically seen in a rheumatology practice who are considered candidates for therapy with agents that are immunomodulatory and disease modifying. Except for injection site reactions and a nonstatistically although potentially clinically significant increase in serious infections in the anakinra versus the placebo groups, the addition of anakinra to a stable background regimen of RA medications introduced no other important safety risk in patients with RA.
在患有活动性疾病的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,研究在标准RA药物治疗基础上加用阿那白滞素的安全性。
本分析进一步评估了一项双盲、安慰剂对照安全性试验前6个月的数据,该试验随后还有一个30个月的开放标签阶段(此处未报告)。患有多种合并症、疾病活动度和背景用药情况各异的RA患者,按照4:1的分配比例随机分为两组,分别接受每日注射100mg阿那白滞素或安慰剂治疗。根据所接受的伴随用药情况,比较阿那白滞素组和安慰剂组患者的不良事件谱,以评估安全性。
与安慰剂组患者(n = 283)相比,阿那白滞素组患者(n = 1116)在上呼吸道感染或总体严重不良事件的发生率上没有差异。阿那白滞素组有更多的注射部位反应(72.6% vs 安慰剂组的32.9%),严重感染略有增加(2.1% vs 安慰剂组的0.4%)。在接受抗高血压药、抗糖尿病药或他汀类药物治疗的患者中,阿那白滞素的安全性特征没有差异。
本研究表明,在通常在风湿病科就诊且被认为是免疫调节和疾病改善药物治疗候选者的患者中,阿那白滞素具有良好的安全性。除了注射部位反应以及阿那白滞素组与安慰剂组相比严重感染虽无统计学意义但可能具有临床意义的增加外,在稳定的RA药物背景治疗方案中加用阿那白滞素,在RA患者中未引入其他重要的安全风险。