Kleinig John
Department of Law and Police Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York 10019, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2004 Feb;39(3):369-98. doi: 10.1081/ja-120029983.
This essay offers an overview of some of the ethical questions raised by governmental and medical interventions into drug use. With respect to the former, it begins with the liberal assumption that constraints on free action are to be justified by reference to its deleterious impact on others, but then qualifies that assumption by noting the social requisites of free action. With respect to medical interventions, it focuses on the codes that have been developed for treatment providers and their clients, and explores the ethical underpinnings of several of their central provisions--informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, nondiscrimination, professionalism, and accountability.
本文概述了政府和医疗干预药物使用所引发的一些伦理问题。关于前者,文章开篇秉持自由主义假设,即对自由行动的限制应以其对他人的有害影响为依据来证明合理,但随后通过指出自由行动的社会必要条件对该假设进行了限定。关于医疗干预,文章聚焦于为治疗提供者及其客户制定的规范,并探讨了其中一些核心条款的伦理基础——知情同意、隐私、保密、非歧视、专业精神和问责制。