Margolin Gayla, Chien Deborah, Duman Sarah E, Fauchier Angèle, Gordis Elana B, Oliver Pamella H, Ramos Michelle C, Vickerman Katrina A
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):157-67. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.157.
Federal regulations, ethical standards, and state laws governing ethics do not adequately address important issues in couple and family research. Including multiple family members, particularly dependent minors, in research requires the special application of fundamental ethical issues, such as confidentiality, privacy, and informed consent. The sensitive, commingled nature of couple and family information necessitates clear policies about data ownership and disclosure. Researchers need to have respect for the family as a unit and to evaluate benefits versus harms for the family as well as for individuals. This article highlights areas of potential concern and ambiguity related to abuse reporting and Certificates of Confidentiality and also addresses ethical issues with observational data, intervention studies, longitudinal designs, and computer-assisted research.
联邦法规、道德标准以及管理道德规范的州法律未能充分解决夫妻及家庭研究中的重要问题。将多个家庭成员,尤其是未成年受抚养者纳入研究,需要特别应用诸如保密、隐私和知情同意等基本道德问题。夫妻及家庭信息的敏感、混合性质使得关于数据所有权和披露的明确政策成为必要。研究人员需要尊重家庭作为一个整体,并评估对家庭以及对个人的利弊。本文重点介绍了与虐待报告和保密证书相关的潜在关注领域和模糊之处,还讨论了观察性数据、干预研究、纵向设计和计算机辅助研究中的伦理问题。