Cook Jennifer R, O'Shea Robert T, Seman Elvis I
Flinders Endogynaecology, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;44(2):111-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00170.x.
To compare surgical outcomes for laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and to document the modifications to the technique of laparovaginal hysterectomy which have occurred over the last decade at Flinders Endogynaecology, South Australia, Australia. The method of choice at the start of the decade was LAVH and by the end of the study period it had been superceded by TLH.
Seven hundred and ninety-four consecutive women underwent hysterectomy between January 1992 and December 2001 at Flinders Endogynaecology. This included 424 women who underwent TLH and 370 who underwent LAVH.
Retrospective review of case history notes and manual extraction of data.
Demographic data including patient age, weight and parity were extracted. Intraoperative complications including ureteric injury, cystotomy, bowel damage or conversion to open procedure were recorded. The rate of non-autologous blood transfusion was recorded and miscellaneous data including length of procedure, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalisation, concomitant procedures carried out and re-admission rates were also recorded.
There was a statistically significant reduction in major morbidity in the TLH group when compared to the LAVH group. The lower rate of conversion to laparotomy in the TLH group was statistically significant (3.0 vs 0.9%). A non-significantly higher rate of ureteric injury was observed in the TLH group (0.7 vs 0.3%). Other outcome measures showed a trend toward an improved outcome for TLH but were not statistically significant. This includes a lower rate of bowel injury in the TLH group (0 vs 0.3%), a lower rate of cystotomy in the TLH group (1.4 vs 3.0%) and lower rate in non-autologous blood transfusion in the TLH group (1.2 vs 3.0%). There was a statistically significant reduction in hospital stay from 4.5 days in the LAVH group to 3.4 days in the TLH group.
The evolution of laparovaginal hysterectomy from LAVH to TLH over the last 13 years has resulted in improved patient outcomes. Ongoing modification of the technique to ensure ureteric protection must remain a priority.
比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的手术效果,并记录澳大利亚南澳大利亚州弗林德斯妇科在过去十年中对腹腔镜阴道子宫切除术技术所做的改进。在这十年开始时,首选的方法是LAVH,而到研究期结束时,它已被TLH所取代。
1992年1月至2001年12月期间,794名连续的女性在弗林德斯妇科接受了子宫切除术。其中包括424名接受TLH的女性和370名接受LAVH的女性。
回顾病历并人工提取数据。
提取人口统计学数据,包括患者年龄、体重和产次。记录术中并发症,包括输尿管损伤、膀胱切开术、肠道损伤或转为开腹手术。记录非自体输血率,并记录其他数据,包括手术时间、估计失血量、住院时间、同期进行的手术以及再次入院率。
与LAVH组相比,TLH组的主要发病率有统计学意义的降低。TLH组较低的开腹转换率具有统计学意义(3.0%对0.9%)。TLH组观察到输尿管损伤率略高,但无统计学意义(0.7%对0.3%)。其他观察指标显示TLH的结果有改善趋势,但无统计学意义。这包括TLH组较低的肠道损伤率(0对0.3%)、较低的膀胱切开术率(1.4%对3.0%)以及较低的非自体输血率(1.2%对3.0%)。住院时间从LAVH组的4.5天有统计学意义地减少到TLH组的3.4天。
在过去13年中,腹腔镜阴道子宫切除术从LAVH发展到TLH,改善了患者的手术效果。持续改进技术以确保输尿管保护仍应是首要任务。