• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用汇总数据对工具进行心理测量学检验。

Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data.

作者信息

Verran J A, Mark B A, Lamb G

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1992 Jun;15(3):237-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770150310.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770150310
PMID:1509115
Abstract

The techniques used to examine the psychometric properties of instruments that measure concepts where individual responses are aggregated to form an index describing a group level phenomenon are reviewed. This examination includes assessing the content validity of items to determine how well they measure group level concepts as well as analyzing reliability and validity at the aggregated rather than individual level. Additional techniques to test for within and between group variability are presented. The latter approaches are useful in determining the consistency and adequacy of individual responses at the group level.

摘要

本文回顾了用于检验测量概念的工具的心理测量特性的技术,这些概念通过汇总个体反应来形成描述群体水平现象的指标。这种检验包括评估项目的内容效度,以确定它们在多大程度上测量了群体水平的概念,以及在汇总而非个体水平上分析信度和效度。还介绍了用于测试组内和组间变异性的其他技术。后一种方法有助于确定群体水平上个体反应的一致性和充分性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data.使用汇总数据对工具进行心理测量学检验。
Res Nurs Health. 1992 Jun;15(3):237-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770150310.
2
A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.用于测试效度和信度的心理测量工具箱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.
3
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
4
Data aggregation: criteria for psychometric evaluation.
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Feb;18(1):77-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180110.
5
Analysis of instruments measuring nurses' attitudes towards research utilization: a systematic review.测量护士对研究应用态度的工具分析:一项系统综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04525.x.
6
Respondent-generated quality of life measures: useful tools for nursing or more fool's gold?受访者自行生成的生活质量测量方法:护理的有用工具还是华而不实之物?
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Aug;32(2):375-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01486.x.
7
Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Staff Perception of the Disruptive Patient Behavior Scale.员工对扰乱性患者行为量表认知的初步心理测量学评估。
J Nurs Adm. 2016 May;46(5):250-6. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000339.
8
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
9
Development and testing of an instrument to measure protective nursing advocacy.测量保护性护理倡导的工具的开发和测试。
Nurs Ethics. 2010 Mar;17(2):255-67. doi: 10.1177/0969733009352070.
10
Content validation of the evidence-based nursing practice assessment tool.循证护理实践评估工具的内容效度验证
Nurse Res. 2018 Jun 7;26(1):33-40. doi: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1544.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaboration processes and perceived effectiveness of integrated care projects in primary care: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.基层医疗中综合护理项目的协作过程与感知效果:一项纵向混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 9;15:463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1125-4.
2
Exploring the success of an integrated primary care partnership: a longitudinal study of collaboration processes.探索综合初级保健伙伴关系的成功:合作过程的纵向研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0634-x.