• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Data aggregation: criteria for psychometric evaluation.

作者信息

Verran J A, Gerber R M, Milton D A

机构信息

University of Arizona, College of Nursing, Tucson 85721.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1995 Feb;18(1):77-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180110.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770180110
PMID:7831498
Abstract

Criteria for the examination of data collected at the individual level and aggregated to the group are proposed. These four empirical criteria relate to content validity, representativeness, reliability, and validity of the aggregated scores as indicators of group phenomena. An example of the use of the criteria is provided using data from a large research project on the implementation of a professional practice model on nine nursing units. The use of the criteria proposed provide a systematic approach to the evaluation of individual data for use at the group level.

摘要

相似文献

1
Data aggregation: criteria for psychometric evaluation.
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Feb;18(1):77-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180110.
2
A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.用于测试效度和信度的心理测量工具箱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.
3
Agreement, reliability, and bias in measurement: Commentary on Bland and Altman (1986; 2010).测量中的一致性、可靠性和偏差:对布兰德和奥特曼(1986年;2010年)的评论
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):134-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
4
Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data.使用汇总数据对工具进行心理测量学检验。
Res Nurs Health. 1992 Jun;15(3):237-40. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770150310.
5
Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools.实践中的信度与效度:评估工具
Paediatr Nurs. 2005 Nov;17(9):43. doi: 10.7748/paed.17.9.43.s29.
6
Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses?可靠性和有效性为何对神经科学护士很重要?
J Neurosci Nurs. 2008 Dec;40(6):369-70, 372. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200812000-00010.
7
Precision, reliability, and validity: essential elements of measurement in nursing research.精确性、可靠性和有效性:护理研究中测量的基本要素。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Oct;13(4):297-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00171.x.
8
Research insights. Part III.研究见解。第三部分。
Rehabil Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):136-8. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2007.tb00167.x.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Pflege. 2018 Aug;31(4):223. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000620.
10
Reliability and validity in research.研究中的信度与效度。
Nurs Stand. 2006;20(44):41-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560.

引用本文的文献

1
Work Environment and Operational Failures Associated With Nurse Outcomes, Patient Safety, and Patient Satisfaction.工作环境和运营故障与护士结局、患者安全和患者满意度相关。
Nurs Res. 2023;72(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000626. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
2
Leveraging the Work Environment to Minimize the Negative Impact of Nurse Burnout on Patient Outcomes.利用工作环境将护士倦怠对患者结局的负面影响降到最低。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020610.
3
Team Functioning And Beliefs About Team Effectiveness In Inter-Professional Teams: Questionnaire Development And Validation.
跨专业团队中的团队运作及对团队效能的信念:问卷编制与验证
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Oct 4;12:827-839. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S218540. eCollection 2019.
4
Measuring patient and family perceptions of team processes and outcomes in healthcare teams: questionnaire development and psychometric evaluation.衡量患者及家属对医疗团队流程和结果的看法:问卷编制与心理测量学评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 6;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3808-0.
5
Understanding the Role of the Professional Practice Environment on Quality of Care in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals.了解专业实践环境对磁铁医院和非磁铁医院护理质量的作用。
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Oct;45(10 Suppl):S52-8. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000253.
6
Understanding the role of the professional practice environment on quality of care in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals.了解专业实践环境对 Magnet® 和非 Magnet 医院护理质量的影响。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Jan;44(1):10-6. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000015.
7
Development of the Hospital Nurse Surveillance Capacity Profile.医院护士监测能力概况的发展
Res Nurs Health. 2009 Apr;32(2):217-28. doi: 10.1002/nur.20316.
8
Nurse burnout and patient satisfaction.护士职业倦怠与患者满意度。
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II57-66. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000109126.50398.5a.