• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医疗中的专业报销与时间管理。一项国际比较。

Professional reimbursement and management of time in general practice. An international comparison.

作者信息

Calnan M, Groenewegen P P, Hutten J

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, U.K.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jul;35(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90168-p.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90168-p
PMID:1509309
Abstract

A hypothetical model was proposed for explaining the relationship between general practitioners' system of payment and the amount of time spent in patient and non-patient work. It was hypothesized that GPs reactions to higher workload vary according to the payment system. In this paper we compare two health care systems which have both mixed systems of payment of GPs. In England and Wales up until April 1990 GPs are partly paid by capitation (approx 45% of their income), partly by allowance (38% of their income) and for a much smaller part fee for service (18% of their income). In the Netherlands GPs are paid by capitation for the publicly insured patients (63% of the average practice list) and fee for service for the privately insured patients. We expect (among other things) a stronger, positive relationship between list size and hours worked in the Netherlands and a comparably strong, negative relationship between list size and booking intervals in the Netherlands and in England and Wales. Drawing on data collected from national surveys of GP workload in the Netherlands and England and Wales these propositions were examined. The results of this comparative analysis showed some support for the propositions in that the relation between list size and number of hours worked in patient related activities is stronger in the Dutch setting than in England and Wales, and about the same strength for the relationship between list size and booking intervals.

摘要

提出了一个假设模型,用于解释全科医生的薪酬体系与花在患者工作和非患者工作上的时间之间的关系。假设全科医生对更高工作量的反应因薪酬体系而异。在本文中,我们比较了两种都采用全科医生混合薪酬体系的医疗保健系统。在英格兰和威尔士,直到1990年4月,全科医生的薪酬部分按人头支付(约占其收入的45%),部分按津贴支付(占其收入的38%),还有一小部分按服务收费(占其收入的18%)。在荷兰,全科医生为参加公共保险的患者按人头收费(占平均诊所名单的63%),为参加私人保险的患者按服务收费。我们预计(除其他外),在荷兰,名单规模与工作时长之间的正相关关系更强,而在荷兰以及英格兰和威尔士,名单规模与预约间隔之间的负相关关系强度相当。利用从荷兰以及英格兰和威尔士全科医生工作量的全国性调查中收集的数据,对这些命题进行了检验。这一比较分析的结果为这些命题提供了一些支持,即名单规模与患者相关活动工作时长之间的关系在荷兰比在英格兰和威尔士更强,而名单规模与预约间隔之间的关系强度大致相同。

相似文献

1
Professional reimbursement and management of time in general practice. An international comparison.全科医疗中的专业报销与时间管理。一项国际比较。
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jul;35(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90168-p.
2
The influence of supply-related characteristics on general practitioners' workload.供应相关特征对全科医生工作量的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(3):349-58. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0076-5.
3
List size, composition of practice and general practitioners' workload in The Netherlands.荷兰的诊所规模、执业构成及全科医生工作量
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Feb;34(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90268-u.
4
Do list size and remuneration affect GPs' decisions about how they provide consultations?诊所规模和薪酬会影响全科医生关于提供诊疗服务方式的决策吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 26;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-39.
5
Financial incentives and primary care provision in Britain: do general practitioners maximise their income?英国的经济激励措施与初级医疗服务:全科医生是否实现了收入最大化?
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1998;6:191-210. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5681-7_10.
6
Workload and job satisfaction among general practitioners: a review of the literature.全科医生的工作量与工作满意度:文献综述
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(10):1111-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90087-s.
7
Effects of different remuneration methods on general medical practice: a comparison of capitation and fee-for-service payment.不同薪酬支付方式对全科医疗的影响:按人头付费与按服务项目付费的比较
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1988 Oct-Dec;3(4):245-58. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740030404.
8
Salaried and fee-for-service general practitioners: is there a difference in patient turnover?受薪和按服务收费的全科医生:患者周转率有差异吗?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Sep;12(3):209-13. doi: 10.3109/02813439409003701.
9
Paying doctors by salary: a controlled study of general practitioner behaviour in England.按薪水支付医生薪酬:对英格兰全科医生行为的一项对照研究。
Health Policy. 2003 Jun;64(3):415-23. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00204-x.
10
Rationale for the new GP deprivation payment scheme in England: effects of moving from electoral ward to enumeration district underprivileged area scores.英格兰新的全科医生贫困支付计划的基本原理:从选举选区到枚举区贫困地区得分变化的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jun;51(467):451-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Care Physician Panel Size and Quality of Care: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada.初级保健医生小组规模与医疗质量:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.1864.
2
Do list size and remuneration affect GPs' decisions about how they provide consultations?诊所规模和薪酬会影响全科医生关于提供诊疗服务方式的决策吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 26;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-39.
3
The modernisation of general practice in the UK: 1980 to 1995 and beyond. Part II.英国全科医疗的现代化:1980年至1995年及以后。第二部分。
Postgrad Med J. 1996 Sep;72(851):539-46. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.851.539.
4
General practitioners and incentives.全科医生与激励措施。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1156-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1156.