Suppr超能文献

使用8毫米或10毫米大电极导管及高输出射频能量发生器对1型心房扑动进行射频导管消融:一项多中心安全性和有效性研究的结果

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator: results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study.

作者信息

Feld Gregory, Wharton Marcus, Plumb Vance, Daoud Emile, Friehling Ted, Epstein Laurence

机构信息

UCSD Medical Center, University of California, San Diego, California 92103, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 21;43(8):1466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We studied the safety and efficacy of atrial flutter (AFL) ablation using 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a 100-W radiofrequency (RF) generator.

BACKGROUND

Large-tip electrode catheters may be more effective for ablation of AFL.

METHODS

There were 169 patients (age 61 +/- 12 years). Short-term end points were bidirectional isthmus block and no inducible AFL. After ablation, patients were seen at one, three, and six months, with event monitoring performed weekly and for any symptoms. Three quality-of-life (QOL) surveys were completed during follow-up.

RESULTS

Short-term success was achieved in 158 patients (93%), with 12 +/- 11 RF applications. The efficacy of 8- and 10-mm electrodes was similar (p = NS). The number of RF applications (10 +/- 8 vs. 14 +/- 8) and ablation time (0.5 +/- 0.4 h vs. 0.8 +/- 0.6 h) were less with the 10- versus 8-mm electrode, respectively (p < 0.01). Of 158 patients with short-term success, 42 patients were not evaluated for success at six months because of study exclusions. Of 116 patients with short-term success evaluated at six months, 112 (97%) patients had no AFL recurrence. Of those without AFL recurrence at six months, 95% and 93% remained free of symptoms at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Ablation of AFL improved QOL scores (p < 0.05) and reduced anti-arrhythmic and rate-control drug use (p < 0.05). Complications occurred in 6 (3.6%) of 169 patients, but there were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation of AFL with 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-power RF generator was safe and effective and improved QOL. The number and duration of RF applications were lower with 10- versus 8-mm electrode catheters.

摘要

目的

我们研究了使用8毫米或10毫米电极导管和100瓦射频发生器进行心房扑动(AFL)消融的安全性和有效性。

背景

大尖端电极导管可能对AFL消融更有效。

方法

共有169例患者(年龄61±12岁)。短期终点为双向峡部阻滞且无诱发性AFL。消融后,在1个月、3个月和6个月时对患者进行随访,每周进行事件监测并关注任何症状。在随访期间完成了三项生活质量(QOL)调查。

结果

158例患者(93%)取得短期成功,平均进行了12±11次射频应用。8毫米和10毫米电极的有效性相似(p=无显著差异)。与8毫米电极相比,10毫米电极的射频应用次数(10±8次对14±8次)和消融时间(0.5±0.4小时对0.8±0.6小时)分别更少(p<0.01)。在158例取得短期成功的患者中,42例因研究排除标准在6个月时未评估成功情况。在6个月时接受评估的116例短期成功患者中,112例(97%)无AFL复发。在6个月时无AFL复发的患者中,分别有95%和93%在12个月和24个月时仍无症状。AFL消融改善了QOL评分(p<0.05)并减少了抗心律失常和心率控制药物的使用(p<0.05)。169例患者中有6例(3.6%)发生并发症,但无死亡病例。

结论

使用8毫米或10毫米电极导管和高功率射频发生器进行AFL消融安全有效,并改善了QOL。与8毫米电极导管相比,10毫米电极导管的射频应用次数和持续时间更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验