Boriani Giuseppe, Biffi Mauro, Martignani Cristian, Fallani Francesco, Greco Cristiano, Grigioni Francesco, Corazza Ivan, Bartolini Pietro, Rapezzi Claudio, Zannoli Romano, Branzi Angelo
Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Apr;94(2-3):151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.05.016.
Various modalities of cardiac pacing have been proposed in the past to improve hemodynamics, either directly or indirectly. Some of these are conventional ways of cardiac stimulation, others such as biventricular or left ventricular pacing, represent dedicated pacing techniques. Left ventricular and biventricular pacing are successfully applied in those patients with congestive heart failure who have conduction disturbances (i.e. left bundle branch block) as they correct the ensuing intra- and interventricular dyssynchrony. This is the reason why these pacing modalities are described as cardiac resynchronization therapy. According to the results of a series of studies, the cardiac resynchronization therapy seems to have a favourable clinical impact in terms of quality of life, morbidity and hospitalization rate. On-going and future studies should assess the impact of resynchronization therapy on overall mortality and its cost-effectiveness profile in specific subgroups of patients. Other open issues regard (i) the convenience of using biventricular pacing as a pacing-alone therapy or in combination with ventricular defibrillation capability, especially for potential candidates to heart transplantation, and (ii) the ways to identify properly the responders to resynchronization therapy.
过去已经提出了各种心脏起搏方式,以直接或间接改善血流动力学。其中一些是传统的心脏刺激方式,其他的如双心室或左心室起搏,则代表了专门的起搏技术。左心室和双心室起搏成功应用于患有传导障碍(即左束支传导阻滞)的充血性心力衰竭患者,因为它们纠正了随之而来的室内和室间不同步。这就是为什么这些起搏方式被称为心脏再同步治疗的原因。根据一系列研究的结果,心脏再同步治疗在生活质量、发病率和住院率方面似乎具有良好的临床影响。正在进行的和未来的研究应该评估再同步治疗对总死亡率的影响及其在特定患者亚组中的成本效益概况。其他未解决的问题包括:(i)将双心室起搏作为单独的起搏治疗或与心室除颤功能联合使用的便利性,特别是对于心脏移植的潜在候选者;(ii)正确识别再同步治疗反应者的方法。