Dankaerts Wim, O'Sullivan Peter Bruce, Burnett Angus Firth, Straker Leon Melville, Danneels Lieven Andre
School of Physiotherapy, Bld 408, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, 6845, WA, Australia.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Jun;14(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001.
The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of trunk muscle activity measured by means of surface electromyography (EMG) during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC/sub-MVC) over repeated trials within-day and between-days in healthy controls and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Eleven volunteers (six controls and five CLBP patients) were assessed twice with a 1-week interval. Surface EMG signals were recorded bilaterally from six trunk muscles. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement as a percentage of the grand mean (%SEM) were calculated. MVC and sub-MVC showed excellent within-day reliability in both healthy controls and CLBP patients (ICC mean 0.91; range 0.75-0.98; %SEM mean 4%; range 1-12%). Sub-MVC for both groups between-days showed excellent reliability (ICC mean 0.88; range 0.78-0.97; %SEM mean 7%; range 3-11%). The between-days MVC for both groups showed trends towards lower levels of reliability (ICC mean 0.70; range 0.19-0.99; %SEM mean 17%; range 4-36%) when compared to sub-MVC. Findings of the study provide evidence that sub-MVC are preferable for amplitude normalisation when assessing EMG signals of trunk muscles between-days.
本研究的目的是比较在健康对照者和慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中,在一天内和不同日期的重复试验中,通过表面肌电图(EMG)测量的躯干肌肉活动在最大和次最大自主等长收缩(MVC/次MVC)期间的可靠性。11名志愿者(6名对照者和5名CLBP患者)接受了两次评估,间隔1周。从六块躯干肌肉双侧记录表面EMG信号。计算组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差占总均值的百分比(%SEM)。MVC和次MVC在健康对照者和CLBP患者中均显示出良好的日内可靠性(ICC均值0.91;范围0.75 - 0.98;%SEM均值4%;范围1 - 12%)。两组不同日期的次MVC显示出良好的可靠性(ICC均值0.88;范围0.78 - 0.97;%SEM均值7%;范围3 - 11%)。与次MVC相比,两组不同日期的MVC显示出可靠性水平较低的趋势(ICC均值0.70;范围0.19 - 0.99;%SEM均值17%;范围4 - 36%)。该研究结果提供了证据,表明在评估不同日期的躯干肌肉EMG信号时,次MVC更适合用于幅度归一化。