LaScala Elizabeth A, Gruenewald Paul J, Johnson Fred W
Prevention Research Center, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 900, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Jul;36(4):569-76. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00063-0.
Geographic studies of the incidence and prevalence of child pedestrian injury collisions in different community environments have been primarily descriptive and idiosyncratic, reflecting one or another likely determinant of the places where these injuries occur. The current study maintains that multiple determinants of child pedestrian injury collisions must be considered in evaluating the unique contributions of any one community feature to injury rates. These features include local characteristics of populations, such as rates of unemployment, and places, such as locations of schools. Schools are one stable geographic feature associated with regular, often concentrated periods of complex and congested traffic patterns. The objective of the present study was to examine annual rates of child pedestrian injury in four California communities with a focus on the unique contribution of schools to injury risk. We predicted that annual numbers of child pedestrian injury collisions (both in-school and summer combined) would be greater in communities with higher youth population densities, more unemployment, fewer high-income households, and higher traffic flow. It was hypothesized that youth population density and its interaction with the number of schools in a given area would be related to greater rates of child pedestrian collisions during in-school months. An ecological approach was taken that divided the four communities into 102 geographic units with an average of 6321 people residing in each unit. Archival data on traffic flow, number of child pedestrian injury collisions and locations of schools were obtained from state agencies. Individual-level data were obtained from a general population survey conducted in the communities. The results showed that annual numbers of injuries were greater in areas with higher youth population densities, more unemployment, fewer high-income households, and greater traffic flow. Annual numbers of injuries during in-school months were greater in areas containing middle schools and greater population densities of youth.
关于不同社区环境中儿童行人受伤碰撞发生率和患病率的地理研究主要是描述性的且具有独特性,反映了这些伤害发生地点的一个或另一个可能的决定因素。当前的研究认为,在评估任何一个社区特征对伤害率的独特贡献时,必须考虑儿童行人受伤碰撞的多个决定因素。这些特征包括人口的当地特征,如失业率,以及地点特征,如学校位置。学校是一个稳定的地理特征,与定期的、通常集中的复杂拥堵交通模式时期相关。本研究的目的是检查加利福尼亚四个社区的儿童行人年度受伤率,重点关注学校对伤害风险的独特贡献。我们预测,在青年人口密度较高、失业率较高、高收入家庭较少且交通流量较大的社区,儿童行人受伤碰撞的年度数量(包括校内和暑期的总和)会更多。据推测,青年人口密度及其与特定区域内学校数量的相互作用将与校内月份儿童行人碰撞发生率较高有关。采用了一种生态方法,将这四个社区划分为102个地理单元,每个单元平均居住着6321人。交通流量、儿童行人受伤碰撞数量和学校位置的档案数据来自州机构。个体层面的数据来自在这些社区进行的一般人口调查。结果表明,在青年人口密度较高、失业率较高、高收入家庭较少且交通流量较大的地区,年度受伤数量更多。在有中学且青年人口密度较大的地区,校内月份的年度受伤数量更多。