Bonten Marc J M, Kollef Marin H, Hall Jesse B
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 15;38(8):1141-9. doi: 10.1086/383039. Epub 2004 Mar 30.
Risk factors for the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), as identified in epidemiological studies, have provided a basis for testable interventions in randomized trials. We describe how these results have influenced patient treatment. Single interventions in patients undergoing intubation have focused on either reducing aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions, modulation of colonization (in either the oropharynx, the stomach, or the whole digestive tract), use of systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis, or ventilator circuit changes. More recently, multiple simultaneously implemented interventions have been used. In general, routine measures to decrease oropharyngeal aspiration and antibiotic-containing prevention strategies appear to be the most effective, and the latter were associated with improved rates of patient survival in recent trials. These benefits must be balanced against the widespread fear of emergence of antibiotic resistance. In hospital settings with low baseline levels of antibiotic resistance, however, the benefits to patient outcome may outweigh this fear of resistance. In settings with high levels of antibiotic resistance, combined approaches of non-antibiotic using strategies and education programs might be most beneficial.
流行病学研究中确定的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生的危险因素,为随机试验中可检验的干预措施提供了依据。我们描述了这些结果如何影响患者治疗。对接受插管的患者进行的单一干预措施主要集中在减少口咽分泌物的误吸、调节定植(在口咽、胃或整个消化道)、使用全身性抗菌预防措施或改变呼吸机回路。最近,已采用多种同时实施的干预措施。一般来说,减少口咽误吸的常规措施和含抗生素的预防策略似乎最有效,并且在最近的试验中,后者与患者生存率的提高相关。这些益处必须与对抗生素耐药性出现的广泛担忧相权衡。然而,在抗生素耐药性基线水平较低的医院环境中,对患者预后的益处可能超过对抗生素耐药性的担忧。在抗生素耐药性水平较高的环境中,采用不使用抗生素的策略和教育计划的联合方法可能最有益。