Palatini Paolo, Mugellini Amedeo, Spagnuolo Vitaliano, Santonastaso Massimo, Ambrosia Giovanni Battista, Caiazza Alberto, Malacco Ettore
Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, University of Padua, Italy.
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Apr;9(2):91-7. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200404000-00006.
The aim of this study was to compare the time-effect profiles of a once-daily administration of valsartan and amlodipine, each given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, in terms of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
One hundred and sixty-four elderly outpatients with systolic hypertension received valsartan 80 mg (n=79) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=85) once daily for eight weeks, after which the patients with poorly controlled office BP were up-titrated to valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg once daily. If their office systolic BP was still >140 mmHg after eight weeks at these doses, 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide was added for a further eight weeks. The hourly BP decreases in all of the patients were calculated on the basis of 24-h ambulatory recordings made after the placebo period and at the end of active treatment. The trough/peak ratio and smoothness index were calculated in the responders.
Both the valsartan- and amlodipine-based treatments effectively lowered mean 24-h, daytime and night-time systolic ambulatory BP (all p<0.001) without any significant differences between the two regimens. Ambulatory heart rate decreased in the subjects on valsartan and slightly increased in those on amlodipine (the differences in 24-h and daytime heart rate were significant (p=0.008 and 0.002 respectively). Among the 138 responders, the valsartan-based treatment had a greater anti-hypertensive effect during the daytime hours (p=0.02), a difference that was also significant for average 24-h BP (p=0.02). The mean systolic BP trough/peak ratio was 0.56 in the patients on valsartan, and 0.77 in those on amlodipine (NS). The smoothness index was respectively 1.70 and 1.58 (NS).
The present results show that both the valsartan- and amlodipine-based treatments lead to a similar long-term reduction in 24-h systolic BP. However, in treatment responders, valsartan has a greater anti-hypertensive effect during the daytime.
本研究旨在比较缬沙坦和氨氯地平每日一次单独给药或与氢氯噻嗪联合给药时,对老年单纯收缩期高血压患者动态血压(BP)和心率的时间效应曲线。
164例老年收缩期高血压门诊患者,每日一次服用缬沙坦80mg(n = 79)或氨氯地平5mg(n = 85),持续8周,之后血压控制不佳的患者剂量上调至缬沙坦160mg或氨氯地平10mg每日一次。如果在这些剂量下8周后其诊室收缩压仍>140mmHg,则加用12.5mg氢氯噻嗪,再治疗8周。根据安慰剂期后和积极治疗结束时的24小时动态记录,计算所有患者每小时的血压下降情况。在反应者中计算谷峰比和平滑指数。
基于缬沙坦和氨氯地平的治疗均有效降低24小时、日间和夜间平均动态收缩压(均p<0.001),两种治疗方案之间无显著差异。服用缬沙坦的受试者动态心率下降,服用氨氯地平的受试者动态心率略有增加(24小时和日间心率差异有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.008和0.002)。在138例反应者中,基于缬沙坦的治疗在白天具有更大的降压作用(p = 0.02),这一差异在24小时平均血压中也有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。服用缬沙坦的患者平均收缩压谷峰比为0.56,服用氨氯地平的患者为0.77(无统计学差异)。平滑指数分别为1.70和1.58(无统计学差异)。
目前的结果表明,基于缬沙坦和氨氯地平的治疗均可使24小时收缩压产生相似的长期降低。然而,在治疗反应者中,缬沙坦在白天具有更大的降压作用。