• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂替米沙坦治疗单纯收缩期高血压(ARAMIS)研究:20毫克、40毫克或80毫克替米沙坦与12.5毫克氢氯噻嗪或安慰剂的疗效及安全性比较

Angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan in isolated systolic hypertension (ARAMIS) study: efficacy and safety of telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg versus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo.

作者信息

Manolis Athanasios J, Reid John L, de Zeeuw Dick, Murphy Michael B, Seewaldt-Becker Elke, Köster Jürgen

机构信息

Txanio General Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2004 May;22(5):1033-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200405000-00027.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-200405000-00027
PMID:15097245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify telmisartan doses that are more effective than placebo and non-inferior to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, and are well tolerated, in lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 2-4-week single-blind placebo run-in was followed by randomization of 1039 patients (age 36-84 years) with ISH [seated SBP 150-179 mmHg and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg] to once-daily double-blind treatment with telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg, HCTZ 12.5 mg, or placebo. The change in seated trough SBP after 6 weeks compared with baseline was the primary end point. Secondary end points were the percentage achieving the target fall in SBP and the change from baseline in seated trough DBP. Incidence and severity of adverse events and physical examination and laboratory parameters were monitored for the safety evaluation.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics in telmisartan 20 mg (n = 206), 40 mg (n = 210), 80 mg (n = 207), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 205) and placebo (n = 211) treatment groups were comparable: (mean +/- SD) age, 63.0 +/- 10.9 years; SBP, 162.9 +/- 8.1 mmHg; and DBP 83.4 +/- 5.0 mmHg. No previous antihypertensive therapy had been received by 66% of the patients. Mean reductions in seated trough SBP (adjusted for baseline and country) were: telmisartan 20 mg, 15.6 mmHg (n = 204); 40 mg, 17.9 mmHg (n = 209); and 80 mg, 16.9 mmHg (n = 205), compared with placebo, 11.4 mmHg (n = 208), and HCTZ 12.5 mg, 15.7 mmHg (n = 204). The target fall in seated trough SBP (< or =140 mmHg or reduction by > or =20 mmHg) was achieved in 46.6% (telmisartan 20 mg), 51.7% (telmisartan 40 mg), 53.9% (telmisartan 80 mg), 27.4% (placebo) and 42.7% (HCTZ 12.5 mg); the response rate was significantly higher for telmisartan 80 mg than for HCTZ 12.5 mg (P = 0.03). All-causality adverse events occurred in 19.9, 17.6 and 20.3% receiving telmisartan 20, 40 and 80 mg, respectively; 20.9% receiving placebo and 22.0% receiving HCTZ 12.5 mg. No drug-related serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

All doses of telmisartan (20-80 mg) were significantly superior to placebo in reducing SBP in patients with ISH and clinically comparable to HCTZ 12.5 mg. Tolerability of telmisartan was similar to that of placebo.

摘要

目的

确定在降低单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)患者收缩压(SBP)方面比安慰剂更有效且不劣于12.5 mg氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)、耐受性良好的替米沙坦剂量。

患者和方法

1039例ISH患者(年龄36 - 84岁,坐位SBP 150 - 179 mmHg且坐位舒张压(DBP)< 90 mmHg)先进行2 - 4周单盲安慰剂导入期,然后随机分为每日一次接受20、40或80 mg替米沙坦、12.5 mg HCTZ或安慰剂的双盲治疗。6周时坐位谷值SBP相对于基线的变化为主要终点。次要终点为达到SBP目标降幅的百分比以及坐位谷值DBP相对于基线的变化。监测不良事件的发生率和严重程度以及体格检查和实验室参数以进行安全性评估。

结果

替米沙坦20 mg(n = 206)、40 mg(n = 210)、80 mg(n = 207)、HCTZ 12.5 mg(n = 205)和安慰剂(n = 211)治疗组的基线人口统计学特征具有可比性:(均值±标准差)年龄63.0±10.9岁;SBP 162.9±8.1 mmHg;DBP 83.4±5.0 mmHg。66%的患者此前未接受过抗高血压治疗。坐位谷值SBP的平均降低值(根据基线和国家进行调整)为:替米沙坦20 mg组降低15.6 mmHg(n = 204);40 mg组降低17.9 mmHg(n = 209);80 mg组降低16.9 mmHg(n = 205),而安慰剂组降低11.4 mmHg(n = 208),HCTZ 12.5 mg组降低了15.7 mmHg(n = 204)。坐位谷值SBP达到目标降幅(≤140 mmHg或降低≥20 mmHg)的比例在替米沙坦20 mg组为46.6%,40 mg组为51.7%,80 mg组为53.9%,安慰剂组为27.4%,HCTZ 12.5 mg组为42.7%;替米沙坦80 mg组的反应率显著高于HCTZ 组12.5 mg(P = 0.03)。接受20、40和80 mg替米沙坦治疗的患者中,全因性不良事件的发生率分别为19.9%、17.6%和20.3%;接受安慰剂治疗的为20.9%,接受12.5 mg HCTZ治疗的为22.0%。未发生与药物相关的严重不良事件。

结论

所有剂量的替米沙坦(20 - 80 mg)在降低ISH患者SBP方面均显著优于安慰剂,且在临床上与12.5 mg HCTZ相当。替米沙坦的耐受性与安慰剂相似。

相似文献

1
Angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan in isolated systolic hypertension (ARAMIS) study: efficacy and safety of telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg versus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂替米沙坦治疗单纯收缩期高血压(ARAMIS)研究:20毫克、40毫克或80毫克替米沙坦与12.5毫克氢氯噻嗪或安慰剂的疗效及安全性比较
J Hypertens. 2004 May;22(5):1033-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200405000-00027.
2
Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与替米沙坦或氢氯噻嗪单药治疗轻至中度高血压患者:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
Clin Ther. 2001 Jun;23(6):833-50. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80072-2.
3
Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗黑人轻至中度高血压患者。
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Jan;24(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240111.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus HCTZ compared with losartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension.与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪相比,替米沙坦加氢氯噻嗪固定剂量组合治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2003 May;57(4):273-9.
5
Comparison of 26-week efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan and atenolol, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide as required, in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a randomized, multicenter study.替米沙坦与阿替洛尔联合按需服用氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的26周疗效和耐受性比较:一项随机、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 2001 Jan;23(1):108-23. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80034-5.
6
Long-term, open-label evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg fixed-dose combination alone or with other antihypertensive medication.对单独使用或与其他抗高血压药物联用的80毫克替米沙坦/25毫克氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方制剂的安全性和疗效进行长期开放标签评估。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;10(3):345-52. doi: 10.1517/14656560802707937.
7
Impact of angiotensin receptor blockade in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in 2121 patients with stage 1-2 hypertension.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合氢氯噻嗪 25mg 治疗 2121 例 1-2 期高血压患者的影响。
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Dec;23(12):817-25. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.28. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
8
Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study.替米沙坦与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压——一项随机动态血压监测研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Aug;17(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592.
9
Comparison of telmisartan with lisinopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与赖诺普利治疗轻至中度高血压患者的比较。
Am J Ther. 1999 May;6(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199905000-00007.
10
Efficacy and safety of telmisartan vs. losartan in control of mild-to-moderate hypertension: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study.替米沙坦与氯沙坦治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲研究
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2004 Dec(145):46-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00410.x.

引用本文的文献

1
New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.高血压与心血管风险管理的新标准:聚焦替米沙坦
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Mar 24;6:113-33. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s7857.
2
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2.
3
Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.替米沙坦:其在高血压管理中的应用综述
Drugs. 2006;66(1):51-83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666010-00004.
4
Telmisartan: a review of its use in hypertension.替米沙坦:其在高血压治疗中的应用综述
Drugs. 2001;61(10):1501-29. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161100-00009.