McShane Franklin, Fagerlund Kathleen A
Minneapolis VA School of Anesthesia, Minneapolis, Minn., USA.
AANA J. 2004 Feb;72(1):31-52.
The purpose of this article is to report the results of the 2001 Professional Practice Analysis performed by the Council on Certification of Nurse Anesthetists. This analysis was used to validate the content and test specifications for the National Certification Examination. A total of 2,545 surveys were mailed to 2 groups of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and 1,197 surveys were returned, a response rate of 47%. The first section of the survey gathered relevant demographic, educational, and experiential background. The second section gathered data concerning the frequency in which they encountered, and the level of expertise required to manage, patient conditions and surgical procedures. The results from this survey were consistent with previous surveys. The Rasch rating scale model was used to transform the results from ordinal data into a linear measure of the item frequency and importance. Members of the Council on Certification of Nurse Anesthetists carefully reviewed all the survey results and voted to maintain the current test specifications and percentages.
本文旨在报告美国麻醉护士认证委员会(Council on Certification of Nurse Anesthetists)于2001年进行的专业实践分析结果。该分析用于验证国家认证考试的内容和测试规范。总共向两组认证注册麻醉护士邮寄了2545份调查问卷,回收了1197份,回复率为47%。调查问卷的第一部分收集了相关的人口统计学、教育和经验背景信息。第二部分收集了有关他们遇到各种患者病情和外科手术的频率以及处理这些情况所需专业水平的数据。本次调查结果与以往调查一致。采用拉施评分量表模型将有序数据的结果转换为项目频率和重要性的线性度量。美国麻醉护士认证委员会的成员仔细审查了所有调查结果,并投票决定维持当前的测试规范和百分比。