• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

破坏生成过程的操作会降低对范例的遵从性:来自两种范式的证据。

Manipulations that disrupt generative processes decrease conformity to examples: evidence from two paradigms.

作者信息

Landau Joshua D, Leynes P Andrew

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences, York College, Pennsylvania 17405-7199, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2004 Jan;12(1):90-103. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000388.

DOI:10.1080/09658210244000388
PMID:15098623
Abstract

Participants in six experiments viewed experimenter-provided examples of space creatures (Experiments 1-3) or nonwords (Experiments 4-5b) and then created their own novel space creatures or nonwords. Consistent with previous research, people borrowed many of the features found in the examples despite instructions to avoid using any aspects of the experimenter's examples. However, requiring people to include a designated shape in their space creatures or a designated letter in their nonwords attenuated this effect. Additionally, the type of shape or letter (conventional versus unconventional) also affected conformity. These results suggest that the strategies that people use to create novel products can affect the level of conformity and also highlight the importance of adopting unconventional, or at the very least, new strategies when creating new products.

摘要

在六个实验中,参与者观看了实验者提供的太空生物示例(实验1 - 3)或非单词示例(实验4 - 5b),然后创造他们自己的新型太空生物或非单词。与之前的研究一致,尽管有指示要求避免使用实验者示例的任何方面,但人们还是借用了示例中发现的许多特征。然而,要求人们在他们创造的太空生物中包含一个指定的形状,或者在非单词中包含一个指定的字母,会减弱这种影响。此外,形状或字母的类型(常规与非常规)也会影响从众性。这些结果表明,人们用于创造新产品的策略会影响从众程度,也凸显了在创造新产品时采用非常规策略或至少是新策略的重要性。

相似文献

1
Manipulations that disrupt generative processes decrease conformity to examples: evidence from two paradigms.破坏生成过程的操作会降低对范例的遵从性:来自两种范式的证据。
Memory. 2004 Jan;12(1):90-103. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000388.
2
Source monitoring in a generative task.生成任务中的源监测
Memory. 2002 May;10(3):187-97. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000326.
3
Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality.《理性想象:人们如何创造现实的替代方案》摘要
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Dec;30(5-6):439-53; discussion 453-76. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002579. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
4
The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task.在生成性认知任务中对先验知识的无意使用。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):94-105. doi: 10.3758/bf03201216.
5
Creativity and the homospatial process. Experimental studies.创造力与同空间过程。实验研究。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;11(3):443-59.
6
[The types of human autonomic reactions during the solving of creative imagination tasks].
Fiziol Cheloveka. 1990 May-Jun;16(3):20-7.
7
Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model.情绪与创造力关联中的享乐色调和激活水平:迈向创造力模型的双路径
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):739-56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
8
Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.权力减轻情境压力:对创造力、从众和失调的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1450-66. doi: 10.1037/a0012633.
9
Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets.框内思考:反事实思维定式引发的关系处理方式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(1):33-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33.
10
When elaboration leads to appropriation: unconscious plagiarism in a creative task.
Memory. 2005 Aug;13(6):561-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000232.

引用本文的文献

1
Chasing red herrings: Memory of distractors causes fixation in creative problem solving.追逐红鲱鱼:分心物记忆导致创造性问题解决中的固着。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):671-684. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0799-3.