De Dreu Carsten K W, Baas Matthijs, Nijstad Bernard A
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):739-56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
To understand when and why mood states influence creativity, the authors developed and tested a dual pathway to creativity model; creative fluency (number of ideas or insights) and originality (novelty) are functions of cognitive flexibility, persistence, or some combination thereof. Invoking work on arousal, psychophysiological processes, and working memory capacity, the authors argue that activating moods (e.g., angry, fearful, happy, elated) lead to more creative fluency and originality than do deactivating moods (e.g., sad, depressed, relaxed, serene). Furthermore, activating moods influence creative fluency and originality because of enhanced cognitive flexibility when tone is positive and because of enhanced persistence when tone is negative. Four studies with different mood manipulations and operationalizations of creativity (e.g., brainstorming, category inclusion tasks, gestalt completion tests) support the model.
为了理解情绪状态何时以及为何会影响创造力,作者开发并测试了一个创造力的双路径模型;创造性流畅性(想法或见解的数量)和新颖性(新奇性)是认知灵活性、坚持性或二者某种组合的函数。作者援引了关于唤醒、心理生理过程和工作记忆容量的研究成果,认为激活情绪(如愤怒、恐惧、快乐、兴高采烈)比去激活情绪(如悲伤、沮丧、放松、平静)能带来更高的创造性流畅性和新颖性。此外,激活情绪影响创造性流畅性和新颖性的原因在于,当情绪基调为积极时,认知灵活性增强;而当情绪基调为消极时,坚持性增强。四项采用不同情绪操纵和创造力操作化方法(如头脑风暴、类别包含任务、格式塔完成测试)的研究支持了该模型。