Kingma J H, Suttorp M J
Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Aug 20;70(5):56A-60A; discussion 60A-61A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91079-j.
Efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide (2 mg/kg body weight in 10 minutes), verapamil (10 mg in 1 minute), and propafenone (2 mg/kg body weight in 10 minutes) were investigated in 90 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). In the first 40 patients, flecainide and verapamil were evaluated; in the second 50 patients, flecainide and propafenone were compared, both in a single-blind randomized study design. The primary end point was sinus rhythm occurring within 1 hour after start of infusion. Sinus rhythm was attained in 32 of 37 patients (86%) with AF treated with flecainide and in 11 of 20 patients (55%) with AF treated with propafenone. In recent onset AF (less than or equal to 24 hours) conversion rates were 24 of 25 patients (96%) in the flecainide group and 8 of 14 patients (57%) in the propafenone group (p less than 0.05). Conversion of AFL occurred in only 1 of 8 patients (13%) in the flecainide-treated patients and in 2 of 5 patients (40%) treated with propafenone (difference not significant). Verapamil was almost ineffective, since only 1 of 20 patients (5%) responded within 1 hour. Time to conversion was 21 +/- 17 minutes in the flecainide group and 16 +/- 10 minutes in the propafenone group. QRS widening occurred in flecainide-treated patients (83 +/- 15 to 99 +/- 20 msec; p less than 0.001), but not after propafenone (83 +/- 11 to 86 +/- 12 msec). Significantly higher plasma levels were found in patients with conversion within 1 hour using propafenone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在90例连续性心房颤动(AF)或心房扑动(AFL)患者中,研究了静脉注射氟卡尼(10分钟内2mg/kg体重)、维拉帕米(1分钟内10mg)和普罗帕酮(10分钟内2mg/kg体重)的疗效和安全性。在前40例患者中,评估了氟卡尼和维拉帕米;在随后的50例患者中,在单盲随机研究设计中比较了氟卡尼和普罗帕酮。主要终点是输注开始后1小时内出现窦性心律。接受氟卡尼治疗的37例AF患者中有32例(86%)达到窦性心律,接受普罗帕酮治疗的20例AF患者中有11例(55%)达到窦性心律。在近期发作的AF(小于或等于24小时)中,氟卡尼组25例患者中有24例(96%)、普罗帕酮组14例患者中有8例(57%)实现转复(p<0.05)。接受氟卡尼治疗的8例患者中有1例(13%)发生AFL转复,接受普罗帕酮治疗的5例患者中有2例(40%)发生转复(差异无统计学意义)。维拉帕米几乎无效,因为20例患者中只有1例(5%)在1小时内有反应。氟卡尼组转复时间为21±17分钟,普罗帕酮组为16±10分钟。接受氟卡尼治疗的患者出现QRS波增宽(从83±15毫秒增至99±20毫秒;p<0.001),而接受普罗帕酮治疗后未出现(从83±11毫秒增至86±12毫秒)。使用普罗帕酮在1小时内实现转复的患者血浆水平显著更高。(摘要截断于250字)