Suppr超能文献

维拉帕米、氟卡尼和普罗帕酮用于房颤急性转复为窦性心律的比较评价

Comparative evaluation of verapamil, flecainide and propafenone for the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.

作者信息

Kondili A, Kastrati A, Popa Y

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Hospital 1, Tirana, Albania.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Sep 14;102(17):510-3.

PMID:2124756
Abstract

In 69 consecutive patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation, we compared the usefulness of verapamil, flecainide and propafenone for the acute conversion to sinus rhythm within 1 hour of the start of intravenous infusion. The patients were randomized to receive verapamil, 10 mg in 5 minutes (n = 29), flecainide, 2 mg/kg in 10 minutes (n = 20) or propafenone, 2 mg/kg in 10 minutes (n = 20). The 3 treatment groups did not differ significantly regarding patient baseline characteristics. Conversion rate was 14% for verapamil, 50% for flecainide and 25% for propafenone. A significant difference (p = 0.02) was found only between the verapamil and flecainide results. Mean time to conversion did not differ significantly. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the only variables correlating with the final result were the type of treatment (p = 0.001) and the duration of arrhythmia (p = 0.005). Mean duration of arrhythmia in converted patients was significantly shorter than in non-converted patients (9.7 [6.6] vs 34.0 [46.1] hours, p = 0.03). Serious side effects were seen only during propafenone infusion (2 patients developed severe hypotension necessitating discontinuation of therapy and administration of intravenous fluids). We conclude that intravenous flecainide appears to be more effective than the other 2 drugs for the acute conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.

摘要

在69例近期发生房颤的连续患者中,我们比较了维拉帕米、氟卡尼和普罗帕酮在静脉输注开始后1小时内急性转复为窦性心律的有效性。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受维拉帕米(5分钟内静脉注射10 mg,n = 29)、氟卡尼(10分钟内静脉注射2 mg/kg,n = 20)或普罗帕酮(10分钟内静脉注射2 mg/kg,n = 20)。三个治疗组在患者基线特征方面无显著差异。维拉帕米的转复率为14%,氟卡尼为50%,普罗帕酮为25%。仅在维拉帕米和氟卡尼的结果之间发现了显著差异(p = 0.02)。转复的平均时间无显著差异。逐步多元回归分析显示,与最终结果相关的唯一变量是治疗类型(p = 0.001)和心律失常持续时间(p = 0.005)。转复患者的心律失常平均持续时间明显短于未转复患者(9.7 [6.6] 小时 vs 34.0 [46.1] 小时,p = 0.03)。仅在普罗帕酮输注期间出现严重副作用(2例患者出现严重低血压,需要停止治疗并静脉补液)。我们得出结论,静脉注射氟卡尼在近期发生的房颤急性转复为窦性心律方面似乎比其他两种药物更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验