Mucci-LoRusso P, Berman B S, Silberstein P T, Citron M L, Bressler L, Weinstein S M, Kaiko R F, Buckley B J, Reder R F
Harper Hospital Division of Hematology and Oncology, and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Eur J Pain. 1998;2(3):239-49. doi: 10.1016/s1090-3801(98)90020-9.
Controlled-release oral formulations of oxycodone and morphine are both suitable analgesics for moderate to severe pain. They were compared in cancer-pain patients randomized to double-blind treatment with controlled-release oxycodone (n = 48) or controlled-release morphine (n = 52) every 12 h for up to 12 days. Stable analgesia was achieved by 83% of controlled-release oxycodone and 81% of controlled-release morphine patients in 2 days (median). Following titration to stable analgesia, pain intensity (0=none to 3=severe) decreased from baseline within each group (p </= 0.005), from 1.9 (0.1) to 1.3 (0.1), mean (SE), with controlled-release oxycodone, and from 1.6 (0.1) to 1.0 (0.1) with controlled-release morphine (no significant between-group differences). Typical opioid adverse experiences were reported in both groups. Hallucinations were reported only with controlled-release morphine (n = 2). Visual analog scores (VAS) for 'itchy' and 'scratchin' were lower with controlled-release oxycodone (p </= 0.044), as was peak-to-trough fluctuation in steady-state plasma concentration (p = 0.004). The correlation between plasma concentration and dose was stronger (p = 0.026) for oxycodone (0.7) than morphine (0.3). The relationship between pain intensity (VAS) and plasma concentration was more positive for oxycodone (p = 0.046). There was a positive relationship between morphine-6-glucuronide concentrations and urea nitrogen and creatinine levels (p = 0.001). Controlled-release oxycodone was as effective as controlled-release morphine in relieving chronic cancer-related pain, and as easily titrated to the individual's need for pain control. While adverse experiences were similar, controlled-release oxycodone was associated with less itching and no hallucinations. Controlled-release oxycodone provides a rational alternative to controlled-release morphine for the management of moderate to severe cancer-related pain.
羟考酮和吗啡的控释口服制剂都是适用于中重度疼痛的镇痛药。对癌症疼痛患者进行了比较,这些患者被随机分为两组,双盲接受每12小时一次的控释羟考酮(n = 48)或控释吗啡(n = 52)治疗,为期12天。在2天内(中位数),83%服用控释羟考酮的患者和81%服用控释吗啡的患者实现了稳定镇痛。在滴定至稳定镇痛后,每组内疼痛强度(0 = 无疼痛至3 = 重度疼痛)均较基线水平下降(p≤0.005),服用控释羟考酮组从1.9(0.1)降至1.3(0.1),均值(标准误),服用控释吗啡组从1.6(0.1)降至1.0(0.1)(组间无显著差异)。两组均报告了典型的阿片类药物不良反应。仅服用控释吗啡的患者报告出现幻觉(n = 2)。服用控释羟考酮时,“瘙痒”和“搔抓”的视觉模拟评分(VAS)较低(p≤0.044),稳态血浆浓度的峰谷波动也较低(p = 0.004)。羟考酮的血浆浓度与剂量之间的相关性(p = 0.026,r = 0.7)比吗啡(r = 0.3)更强。羟考酮的疼痛强度(VAS)与血浆浓度之间的关系更为正向(p = 0.046)。吗啡 - 6 - 葡萄糖醛酸浓度与尿素氮和肌酐水平之间存在正相关(p = 0.001)。控释羟考酮在缓解慢性癌症相关疼痛方面与控释吗啡同样有效,并且同样易于根据个体对疼痛控制的需求进行滴定。虽然不良反应相似,但控释羟考酮引起的瘙痒较少且无幻觉。控释羟考酮为中重度癌症相关疼痛的管理提供了一种合理的替代控释吗啡的选择。