Suppr超能文献

确定癌痛患者中羟吗啡酮缓释剂与羟考酮控释剂的剂量等效性:一项随机对照研究。

Establishing the dosage equivalency of oxymorphone extended release and oxycodone controlled release in patients with cancer pain: a randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Gabrail Nashat Y, Dvergsten Chris, Ahdieh Harry

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jun;20(6):911-8. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003854.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of oxymorphone extended release (ER) and oxycodone controlled release (CR) in patients with moderate to severe cancer pain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 2-period crossover study included adult outpatients (>or= 18 years of age) with moderate or severe cancer pain who were first titrated for 3-10 days with open-label oxymorphone or oxycodone to achieve a stable dose that provided and other efficacy parameters were comparable for adequate analgesia with tolerable adverse events and no requirement for more than 2 doses of rescue medication per day. The subsequent double-blind treatment phase was a 7- to 10-day period of oxycodone CR or oxymorphone ER treatment followed by crossing over to the alternate medication for another 7-10 days. During the treatment phase, up to 2 doses per day of morphine sulfate 15-mg tablets were allowed as rescue.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Assessments included the Brief Pain Inventory, global evaluations, Karnofsky performance status, and clinical laboratory evaluations (serum chemistry profile, complete blood count, urinalysis). Efficacy variables were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with treatment, sequence, and period as fixed effects and subject as a random effect.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients entered the titration/stabilization phase, 44 received at least 1 dose of study drug, 42 completed the first double-blind phase, and 40 completed the second double-blind phase. Mean pain intensity scores the 2 groups. The mean daily dosage of oxycodone CR (91.9 mg) was twice that of oxymorphone ER (45.9 mg), an equianalgesic dose ratio of 2:1. Rescue medication use was low in both groups (approximately 1 tablet of morphine sulfate 15 mg/day). No significant differences in opioid adverse events were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult patients with cancer who were taking oxycodone CR were readily converted to oxymorphone ER and required half the milligram dose to stabilize their pain. Within 72 h, most patients achieved a stable dose that provided adequate relief with similar opioid adverse events.

摘要

目的

比较羟吗啡酮缓释片(ER)和羟考酮控释片(CR)在中重度癌痛患者中的镇痛效果及安全性。

研究设计与方法

这项随机、多中心、双盲、两阶段交叉研究纳入了年龄≥18岁的中重度癌痛成年门诊患者,首先使用羟吗啡酮或羟考酮进行3 - 10天的开放标签滴定,以达到稳定剂量,该剂量能提供充分镇痛效果,且其他疗效参数相当,不良反应可耐受,每天所需解救药物不超过2剂。随后的双盲治疗阶段为期7 - 10天,采用羟考酮控释片或羟吗啡酮缓释片进行治疗,之后交叉使用另一种药物再治疗7 - 10天。在治疗阶段,允许每天使用不超过2剂15毫克硫酸吗啡片作为解救药物。

主要结局指标

评估包括简明疼痛问卷、整体评估、卡氏功能状态评分以及临床实验室评估(血清化学指标、全血细胞计数、尿液分析)。疗效变量采用混合效应模型进行分析,将治疗、序列和阶段作为固定效应,将受试者作为随机效应。

结果

47例患者进入滴定/稳定阶段,44例接受了至少1剂研究药物,42例完成了第一个双盲阶段,40例完成了第二个双盲阶段。两组的平均疼痛强度评分。羟考酮控释片的平均日剂量(91.9毫克)是羟吗啡酮缓释片(45.9毫克)的两倍,等效镇痛剂量比为2:1。两组的解救药物使用量均较低(约每天1片15毫克硫酸吗啡片)。两组之间在阿片类药物不良反应方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

正在服用羟考酮控释片的成年癌症患者可顺利转换为服用羟吗啡酮缓释片,且稳定疼痛所需的毫克剂量减半。在72小时内,大多数患者达到了稳定剂量,该剂量能提供充分缓解,且阿片类药物不良反应相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验