Friederici A D, Gunter T C, Hahne A, Mauth K
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, PO Box 500 355, 04303 Leipzig, Germany.
Neuroreport. 2004 Jan 19;15(1):165-9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200401190-00032.
The functional primacy of syntactic over semantic processes was put to test in an auditory event-related brain potentials study using sentences in which the final words were semantically and/or syntactically incongruent with the prior context. Crucially, these words encoded the syntactically relevant word category information in the suffix, available only after the word stem which carried the semantic information. Semantic violations elicited an N400 and syntactic violations a biphasic LAN-P600 pattern. Words that were semantically and syntactically incongruent with the context evoked a biphasic LAN-P600 ERP pattern, but no N400. The similarity of the ERP pattern for the pure syntactic and the double violation condition provides strong evidence for a functional primacy of initial syntactic over lexical-semantic processes.
在一项听觉事件相关脑电位研究中,对句法过程相对于语义过程的功能首要性进行了测试。该研究使用的句子中,句末单词在语义和/或句法上与前文语境不一致。关键的是,这些单词通过后缀编码句法相关的词类信息,而该信息只有在携带语义信息的词干之后才可用。语义违反引发N400,句法违反引发双相LAN - P600模式。在语义和句法上与语境不一致的单词引发双相LAN - P600 ERP模式,但没有N400。纯句法违反和双重违反条件下ERP模式的相似性为初始句法相对于词汇语义过程的功能首要性提供了有力证据。