Kiland J A, Gabelt B T, Kaufman P L
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3220, USA.
Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):639-51. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2003.11.001.
Long-term use of drugs that suppress aqueous humor formation, such as timolol and dorzolamide, or that redirect aqueous humor outflow from the trabecular meshwork, such as prostaglandin F2alpha analogues, could cause underperfusion of the trabecular meshwork and a secondary decrease in outflow facility. We investigated the mechanism of suppression of aqueous humor formation by timolol in monkey eyes by measuring aqueous humor ascorbate levels. We also determined whether suppression of aqueous humor formation with and without redirection of aqueous humor away from the trabecular meshwork could lead to a subsequent reduction in outflow facility, and whether this reduction was correlated with increased fibronectin levels in anterior chamber aqueous humor. In cynomolgus monkeys, unilateral dose/aqueous humor formation response curves were generated for timolol, dorzolamide, and a combination of timolol + dorzolamide. Aqueous humor formation and/or outflow facility were measured in both eyes after approximately four days, four weeks and seven weeks of twice daily treatment with 3.5 microg timolol + 1.0 mg dorzolamide to one eye and 30% DMSO to the other. In some monkeys, 5 microg prostaglandin F2alpha-isopropyl ester (PG) was added to timolol + dorzolamide for 4-week treatments. Intraocular pressure and corneal endothelial transfer coefficients (k(a)) were also measured at four weeks. Aqueous humor fibronectin levels were determined in four monkeys after approximately 9.5 weeks of timolol + dorzolamide treatment. Aqueous humor formation, intraocular pressure, and aqueous humor ascorbate levels were also determined in rhesus monkeys at baseline and after a single unilateral topical administration of 25 microg timolol. Compared to baseline for the same eye, aqueous humor formation was significantly decreased in treated eyes at all doses of timolol and at 1.8 and 4 mg dorzolamide. Compared to the opposite control eye, aqueous humor formation was lower in treated eyes after 3.5 and 5 microg timolol and after all doses of dorzolamide. Aqueous humor formation after treatment with 3.5 microg timolol + 1.0 mg dorzolamide was decreased in treated vs. control eyes, after four days and was suppressed in both treated and control eyes after four weeks of treatment, but not when PG was added. There was no difference in k(a) values with or without the addition of PG. Intraocular pressure was significantly lower in both treated and control eyes vs. baseline after approximately 6.5 weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide when taken 2 hr after the last dose and after approximately 3.5 weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide + PG when measured 6 hr after the last dose. Outflow facility after treatment with timolol + dorzolamide was unchanged after four days, tended to be lower in the treated vs. control eyes after four and seven weeks, and was significantly lower in treated vs. control eyes after four weeks treatment with timolol + dorzolamide + PG (0.352 +/- 0.052 vs. 0.515 +/- 0.096 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1), p < or = 0.02). Both treated vs. control eye aqueous humor fibronectin levels were below the level of detection for our assay (0.01 microg ml(-1)). The 25 microg timolol dose decreased ipsilateral, but not contralateral intraocular pressure (12.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 15.2 +/- 0.9; p < 0.05) and aqueous humor formation (1.40 +/- 0.08 vs. 2.03 +/- 0.09 microg ml(-1), p < or = 0.01). There was no difference in anterior chamber ascorbate levels in treated vs. control eyes or compared to their respective baselines. Our findings indicate that timolol affects neither ciliary epithelial transport of ascorbate nor aqueous fibronectin levels. Our data also indicate that decreasing aqueous humor formation over a period of time can lead to reduction in outflow facility, particularly when combined with therapy that redirects aqueous from the trabecular meshwork. Future intraocular pressure-lowering therapies for glaucoma may better be directed at enhancing flow through the trabecular pathway as opposed to decreasing aqueous humor formation or rerouting aqueous humor away from the trabecular meshwork.
长期使用抑制房水生成的药物,如噻吗洛尔和多佐胺,或使房水从小梁网重新引流的药物,如前列腺素F2α类似物,可能会导致小梁网灌注不足,并使流出易度继发性降低。我们通过测量房水抗坏血酸水平,研究了噻吗洛尔在猴眼中抑制房水生成的机制。我们还确定了在房水从小梁网重新引流或不重新引流的情况下,抑制房水生成是否会导致随后流出易度降低,以及这种降低是否与前房房水纤连蛋白水平升高相关。在食蟹猴中,生成了噻吗洛尔、多佐胺以及噻吗洛尔+多佐胺组合的单侧剂量/房水生成反应曲线。对一只眼每日两次给予3.5μg噻吗洛尔+1.0mg多佐胺,对另一只眼给予30%二甲基亚砜,在大约4天、4周和7周的治疗后,测量双眼的房水生成和/或流出易度。在一些猴子中,在4周的治疗期间,将5μg前列腺素F2α异丙酯(PG)添加到噻吗洛尔+多佐胺中。在4周时还测量了眼压和角膜内皮转运系数(k(a))。在大约9.5周的噻吗洛尔+多佐胺治疗后,测定了4只猴子的房水纤连蛋白水平。在恒河猴中,在基线时以及在单侧局部单次给予25μg噻吗洛尔后,也测定了房水生成、眼压和房水抗坏血酸水平。与同一只眼的基线相比,在所有剂量的噻吗洛尔以及1.8mg和4mg多佐胺时,治疗眼的房水生成均显著降低。与对侧对照眼相比,在3.5μg和5μg噻吗洛尔后以及在所有剂量的多佐胺后,治疗眼的房水生成较低。在用3.5μg噻吗洛尔+1.0mg多佐胺治疗后,治疗眼与对照眼相比,房水生成在4天后降低,在治疗4周后,治疗眼和对照眼的房水生成均受到抑制,但添加PG时则不然。添加或不添加PG时,k(a)值均无差异。在最后一剂后2小时测量时,在用噻吗洛尔+多佐胺治疗约6.5周后,治疗眼和对照眼的眼压均显著低于基线;在最后一剂后6小时测量时,在用噻吗洛尔+多佐胺+PG治疗约3.5周后,眼压也显著低于基线。在用噻吗洛尔+多佐胺治疗后,4天时流出易度未改变,在4周和7周时,治疗眼与对照眼相比,流出易度趋于降低,在用噻吗洛尔+多佐胺+PG治疗4周后,治疗眼与对照眼相比,流出易度显著降低(0.352±0.052对0.515±0.096μl·min(-1)·mmHg(-1),p≤0.02)。治疗眼与对照眼的房水纤连蛋白水平均低于我们检测方法的检测限(0.01μg/ml)。25μg噻吗洛尔剂量降低了同侧眼压,但未降低对侧眼压(12.6±1.7对15.2±0.9;p<0.05)以及房水生成(1.40±0.08对2.03±0.09μg/ml,p≤0.01)。治疗眼与对照眼相比,前房抗坏血酸水平无差异,与各自的基线相比也无差异。我们的研究结果表明,噻吗洛尔既不影响睫状上皮对抗坏血酸的转运,也不影响房水纤连蛋白水平。我们的数据还表明,一段时间内房水生成减少可导致流出易度降低,特别是当与使房水从小梁网重新引流的治疗联合使用时。未来用于青光眼的降眼压治疗可能更好地针对增强小梁途径的房水流动,而不是减少房水生成或使房水从小梁网改道。