• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing a peer review process for web-based curricula: minting a new coin of the realm.为基于网络的课程开发同行评审流程:铸造领域的新货币。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 2):594-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30218.x.
2
Peer-reviewed Web-based gerontological resources for nursing faculty.
Nurse Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):62-4. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000019.
3
Peer review of teaching in Web-based courses in nursing.基于网络的护理课程教学同行评审
Nurse Educ. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):274-9. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200111000-00012.
4
Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.同行评审医学教育视频竞赛的设计与实施:美国胸科学会视频讲座系列精华
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Oct;11(5):592-596. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00071.1.
5
The use of standards for peer review of online nursing courses: a pilot study.在线护理课程同行评审标准的应用:一项试点研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Jul;48(7):411-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090615-10.
6
From Modules to MOOCs: Application of the Six-Step Approach to Online Curriculum Development for Medical Education.从模块到 MOOCs:六步方法在医学教育在线课程开发中的应用。
Acad Med. 2019 May;94(5):678-685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002580.
7
Exploring the educational value of clinical vignettes from the Society of General Internal Medicine national meeting in the internal medicine clerkship: a pilot study.探索美国普通内科医师学会全国会议临床病例在内科实习中的教育价值:一项试点研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1195-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00596.x.
8
Implementing a systematic course/clerkship peer review process.实施一个系统的课程/见习同伴评审流程。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):930-1. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00034.
9
An international strategic plan to preserve and restore vision: four curricula of ophthalmic education.一项保护和恢复视力的国际战略计划:四门眼科教育课程
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):859-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.01.055.
10
Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics in the Web 3.0 Era: Standards for data, curricula, and activities. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group on Health and Medical Informatics Education.Web 3.0时代生物医学与健康信息学教育:数据、课程与活动标准。国际医学信息学协会健康与医学信息学教育工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2011;6:139-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality specifications in postgraduate medical e-learning: an integrative literature review leading to a postgraduate medical e-learning model.研究生医学电子学习中的质量规范:一项综合文献综述,形成研究生医学电子学习模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 8;16:168. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0700-7.
2
An emerging renaissance in medical education.医学教育领域正在兴起一场复兴。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 2):606-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.45001.x.

本文引用的文献

1
ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning.学习与教学基础:基于网络的学习
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):870-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.870.
2
How many people have ever lived on earth?地球上曾经生活过多少人?
Popul Today. 1995 Feb;23(2):4-5.
3
Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm?医学教学网站:它们反映了学习范式吗?
Med Teach. 2002 Jul;24(4):422-4. doi: 10.1080/01421590220145815.
4
Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures?
Public Health. 2001 Mar;115(2):152-6. doi: 10.1038/sj/ph/1900710.
5
Web-based case simulations for a primary care clerkship.用于基层医疗实习的基于网络的病例模拟
Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):547. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200105000-00090.
6
Approaches to experiential learning, course delivery and validation in medicine. A background document.医学中体验式学习、课程交付与验证的方法。一份背景文件。
Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):282-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00272.x.
7
Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.已发布的评估健康相关网站的标准:综述。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):647-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647.
8
Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education.
Acad Med. 1996 Sep;71(9):979-81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199609000-00013.

为基于网络的课程开发同行评审流程:铸造领域的新货币。

Developing a peer review process for web-based curricula: minting a new coin of the realm.

作者信息

Knight Christopher L, Sakowski Henry A, Houghton Bruce L, Laya Mary B, DeWitt Dawn E

机构信息

University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 2):594-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30218.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30218.x
PMID:15109331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1492336/
Abstract

The World Wide Web creates new challenges and opportunities for medical educators. Prominent among these are the lack of consistent standards by which to evaluate web-based educational tools. We present the instrument that was used to review web-based innovations in medical education submissions to the 2003 Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) national meeting, and discuss the process used by the SGIM web-based clinical curriculum interest group to develop the instrument. The 5 highest-ranked submissions are summarized with commentary from the reviewers.

摘要

万维网给医学教育工作者带来了新的挑战和机遇。其中突出的问题是缺乏评估基于网络的教育工具的统一标准。我们展示了用于评审2003年美国普通内科医学学会(SGIM)全国会议上提交的医学教育领域基于网络创新成果的工具,并讨论了SGIM基于网络的临床课程兴趣小组开发该工具的过程。对排名最高的5份提交成果进行了总结,并附上了评审人员的评论。