Boggi Ugo, Vistoli Fabio, Del Chiaro Marco, Signori Stefano, Croce Chiara, Pietrabissa Andrea, Berchiolli Raffaella, Marchetti Piero, Del Prato Stefano, Mosca Franco
Divisione di Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Trapianti e Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Transplantation. 2004 Apr 27;77(8):1186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000120535.89925.ca.
Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation.
A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics.
Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively).
Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.
赛而斯欧(Celsior)是一种细胞外类型的低粘度保存液,已用于心脏、肺、肝脏和肾脏移植。我们报告了一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验的结果,该试验专门设计用于比较赛而斯欧溶液与威斯康星大学(UW)溶液在临床胰腺移植中的安全性。
总共105例连续获取的胰腺随机分配至用UW溶液(n = 53)或赛而斯欧溶液(n = 52)进行移植物保存。两组在所有供体和受体特征方面具有可比性。
5个移植物被丢弃,100个移植物(50个UW组对50个赛而斯欧组)被移植。UW组的平均冷缺血时间和热缺血时间分别为11.0±2.1小时和37.2±6.0分钟,而赛而斯欧组分别为10.8±1.8小时和38.1±5.9分钟(P =无显著差异)。在用UW溶液保存的一个移植物中记录到延迟的内分泌胰腺功能。11例受体(UW组12%对赛而斯欧组10%,P =无显著差异)需要再次剖腹手术。移植后相同时间间隔内,研究组间的平均血糖、淀粉酶和脂肪酶血清水平保持相当。每个研究组各有1例受体在移植物功能良好时死亡;另外2个移植物分别因动脉血栓形成(赛而斯欧组)和慢性排斥反应(UW组)而丢失。两个研究组的1年精算患者和移植物存活率重叠(分别为98%和96%)。
在本研究报告的冷缺血时间范围内,UW溶液和赛而斯欧溶液在胰腺保存方面具有相似的安全性。