Falzer Paul R
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, CMHC, 34 Park Street, Room 144, New Haven, CT 06508, USA.
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Apr;37(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.02.002.
A recent article in this journal proposed a naturalistic approach to decision making that overcomes problems intrinsic to classical decision theory. The approach emphasizes cognitive and multi-level processes, the development of expert reasoning, and the role of decision support in individual and organizational decision making. The current paper builds on this effort by suggesting a naturalistic, multi-level, theory that can facilitate the dissemination of evidence-based practices (EBPs). The paper presents "Image Theory," a theory that has been extensively investigated in other disciplines, but has yet to be utilized in medical decision research. It is suggested that its rich, empirically tested, distinctions among kinds of cognitive and organizational processes and types of decisions and tasks make Image Theory especially valuable in describing impediments to implementing EBPs. The paper discusses how naturalistic theory can assist clinicians, administrators, researchers, and policy makers in achieving a balance between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered practice.
本期刊最近的一篇文章提出了一种自然主义的决策方法,该方法克服了经典决策理论固有的问题。该方法强调认知和多层次过程、专家推理的发展以及决策支持在个人和组织决策中的作用。本文在此基础上进一步努力,提出了一种自然主义的多层次理论,该理论可以促进循证实践(EBPs)的传播。本文介绍了“意象理论”,这一理论在其他学科中已得到广泛研究,但尚未应用于医学决策研究。有人认为,其在认知和组织过程的种类以及决策和任务的类型之间有着丰富的、经过实证检验的区分,这使得意象理论在描述实施循证实践的障碍方面特别有价值。本文讨论了自然主义理论如何帮助临床医生、管理人员、研究人员和政策制定者在循证医学和以患者为中心的实践之间取得平衡。