Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Implement Sci. 2008 Feb 29;3:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-13.
It is generally acknowledged that a disparity between knowledge and its implementation is adversely affecting quality of care. An example commonly cited is the failure of clinicians to follow clinical guidelines. A guiding assumption of this view is that adherence should be gauged by a standard of conformance. At least some guideline developers dispute this assumption and claim that their efforts are intended to inform and assist clinical practice, not to function as standards of performance. However, their ability to assist and inform will remain limited until an alternative to the conformance criterion is proposed that gauges how evidence-based guidelines are incorporated into clinical decisions.
The proposed investigation has two specific aims to identify the processes that affect decisions about incorporating clinical guidelines, and then to develop ad test a strategy that promotes the utilization of evidence-based practices. This paper focuses on the first aim. It presents the rationale, introduces the clinical paradigm of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and discusses an exemplar of clinician non-conformance to a clinical guideline. A modification of the original study is proposed that targets psychiatric trainees and draws on a cognitively rich theory of decision-making to formulate hypotheses about how the guideline is incorporated into treatment decisions. Twenty volunteer subjects recruited from an accredited psychiatry training program will respond to sixty-four vignettes that represent a fully crossed 2 x 2 x 2 x 4 within-subjects design. The variables consist of criteria contained in the clinical guideline and other relevant factors. Subjects will also respond to a subset of eight vignettes that assesses their overall impression of the guideline. Generalization estimating equation models will be used to test the study's principal hypothesis and perform secondary analyses.
The original design of phase two of the proposed investigation will be changed in recognition of newly published literature on the relative effectiveness of treatments for schizophrenia. It is suggested that this literature supports the notion that guidelines serve a valuable function as decision tools, and substantiates the importance of decision-making as the means by which general principles are incorporated into clinical practice.
人们普遍认为,知识与其实施之间的差距正在对医疗质量产生不利影响。一个常见的例子是临床医生未能遵循临床指南。这种观点的一个指导性假设是,应该通过一致性标准来衡量依从性。至少有一些指南制定者对这一假设提出质疑,并声称他们的努力旨在为临床实践提供信息和帮助,而不是作为绩效标准。然而,在提出替代一致性标准的方法来衡量如何将基于证据的指南纳入临床决策之前,他们的帮助和告知能力仍将受到限制。
拟议的研究有两个具体目标,一是确定影响纳入临床指南决策的过程,二是开发并测试一种促进利用基于证据的实践的策略。本文侧重于第一个目标。它提出了基本原理,介绍了治疗抵抗性精神分裂症的临床范例,并讨论了临床医生不遵守临床指南的一个例子。建议对原始研究进行修改,以针对精神科培训生,并借鉴决策的认知丰富理论,提出关于指南如何纳入治疗决策的假设。从一个认可的精神病学培训计划中招募了 20 名志愿者作为受试者,他们将对 64 个代表完全交叉的 2 x 2 x 2 x 4 被试内设计的情景做出反应。变量包括临床指南中的标准和其他相关因素。受试者还将对评估他们对指南的总体印象的 8 个情景做出反应。将使用广义估计方程模型来检验研究的主要假设并进行二次分析。
认识到关于精神分裂症治疗相对有效性的新发表文献,建议对拟议研究第二阶段的原始设计进行更改。这表明该文献支持了指南作为决策工具具有重要价值的观点,并证实了决策作为将一般原则纳入临床实践的手段的重要性。