Joo Eun-Jeong, Joo Yeon-Ho, Hong Jin-Pyo, Hwang Samuel, Maeng So-Jin, Han Jin-Hee, Yang Byung-Hwan, Lee Yu-Sang, Kim Yong Sik
Eulji University, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Eulji Hospital, Seoul, Korea, South Korea.
Compr Psychiatry. 2004 May-Jun;45(3):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.02.007.
The Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), developed in 1994 by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), was translated into Korean and tested for reliability and diagnostic validity. Concurrent validity was tested using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and clinical diagnoses in 53 patients, most of whom had either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Inter-rater reliability was tested in 24 patients. Test-retest reliability was also tested in 17 patients. Overall and specific diagnostic validity for the Korean version of DIGS (DIGS-K) was excellent for most diagnoses. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability for overall and specific diagnoses also ranged from fair to excellent. For schizoaffective disorder, the test-retest reliability of DIGS-K was in a fair range, although the level was lower than that of other diagnoses. However, its diagnostic validity and inter-rater reliability was below fair range. In conclusion, DIGS-K appears to be a reliable interview for major psychiatric disorders.
1994年由美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)开发的遗传研究诊断访谈(DIGS)被翻译成韩语,并进行了信度和诊断效度测试。采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的结构化临床访谈(SCID)和临床诊断对53名患者进行了同时效度测试,其中大多数患者患有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍。对24名患者进行了评分者间信度测试。还对17名患者进行了重测信度测试。对于大多数诊断而言,韩语版DIGS(DIGS-K)的总体和特定诊断效度都非常好。总体和特定诊断的评分者间信度和重测信度也在一般到优秀的范围内。对于分裂情感性障碍,DIGS-K的重测信度处于一般范围,尽管该水平低于其他诊断。然而,其诊断效度和评分者间信度低于一般范围。总之,DIGS-K似乎是一种用于主要精神障碍的可靠访谈工具。