Vora Gary J, Meador Carolyn E, Stenger David A, Andreadis Joanne D
Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 May;70(5):3047-54. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.5.3047-3054.2004.
DNA microarray-based screening and diagnostic technologies have long promised comprehensive testing capabilities. However, the potential of these powerful tools has been limited by front-end target-specific nucleic acid amplification. Despite the sensitivity and specificity associated with PCR amplification, the inherent bias and limited throughput of this approach constrain the principal benefits of downstream microarray-based applications, especially for pathogen detection. To begin addressing alternative approaches, we investigated four front-end amplification strategies: random primed, isothermal Klenow fragment-based, phi29 DNA polymerase-based, and multiplex PCR. The utility of each amplification strategy was assessed by hybridizing amplicons to microarrays consisting of 70-mer oligonucleotide probes specific for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and by quantitating their sensitivities for the detection of O157:H7 in laboratory and environmental samples. Although nearly identical levels of hybridization specificity were achieved for each method, multiplex PCR was at least 3 orders of magnitude more sensitive than any individual random amplification approach. However, the use of Klenow-plus-Klenow and phi29 polymerase-plus-Klenow tandem random amplification strategies provided better sensitivities than multiplex PCR. In addition, amplification biases among the five genetic loci tested were 2- to 20-fold for the random approaches, in contrast to >4 orders of magnitude for multiplex PCR. The same random amplification strategies were also able to detect all five diagnostic targets in a spiked environmental water sample that contained a 63-fold excess of contaminating DNA. The results presented here underscore the feasibility of using random amplification approaches and begin to systematically address the versatility of these approaches for unbiased pathogen detection from environmental sources.
基于DNA微阵列的筛选和诊断技术长期以来一直有望实现全面的检测能力。然而,这些强大工具的潜力受到前端目标特异性核酸扩增的限制。尽管PCR扩增具有灵敏度和特异性,但这种方法固有的偏差和有限的通量限制了基于微阵列的下游应用的主要优势,特别是在病原体检测方面。为了开始探索替代方法,我们研究了四种前端扩增策略:随机引物法、基于等温Klenow片段的方法、基于phi29 DNA聚合酶的方法和多重PCR。通过将扩增产物与由针对肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7的70聚体寡核苷酸探针组成的微阵列杂交,并定量它们在实验室和环境样品中检测O157:H7的灵敏度,来评估每种扩增策略的效用。尽管每种方法都实现了几乎相同水平的杂交特异性,但多重PCR的灵敏度比任何一种单独的随机扩增方法至少高3个数量级。然而,使用Klenow加Klenow和phi29聚合酶加Klenow串联随机扩增策略比多重PCR具有更好的灵敏度。此外,对于随机方法,所测试的五个基因位点之间的扩增偏差为2至20倍,而多重PCR则大于4个数量级。相同的随机扩增策略也能够在含有63倍过量污染DNA的加标环境水样中检测到所有五个诊断靶点。此处给出的结果强调了使用随机扩增方法的可行性,并开始系统地探讨这些方法从环境来源无偏差地检测病原体的通用性。