Bautista J, Fullerton H, Briseno M, Cui H, Fass R
The Neuro-Enteric Clinical Research Group, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, 3601 S. 6th Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85723, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 May 15;19(10):1123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01941.x.
Empirical trial with high-dose omeprazole has been shown to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.
To determine the clinical value of an empirical trial of high-dose lansoprazole in detecting patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.
Patients who were referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive evaluation, with at least three episodes per week of unexplained chest pain as the predominant symptom, were enrolled into the study. Oesophageal mucosal disease was determined by upper endoscopy followed by 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring to assess acid exposure. Patients were then randomized to either placebo or lansoprazole 60 mg am and 30 mg pm for 7 days. After a washout period of 1 week, patients crossed over to the other arm of the study for an additional 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing severity and frequency of chest pain as the predominant symptom throughout the baseline treatment and washout periods. The lansoprazole empirical trial was considered diagnostic if chest pain score improved > or =50% than baseline.
Of the 40 patients with non-cardiac chest pain that were enrolled, 18 (45%) had erosive oesophagitis and/or abnormal pH test (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive) and 22 (55%) had both tests negative (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive patients, 14 (78%) had significantly higher symptom improvement on lansoprazole than on placebo (22%) (P = 0.0143). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative group, two (9.1%) markedly improved on the medication and eight (36.3%) on placebo (P = 0.75). The sensitivity and specificity of the lansoprazole empirical trial was 78 and 80%, respectively. By day 2, 12 (85.7%) of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain responders had either complete or almost complete symptom resolution.
The lansoprazole empirical trial is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain patients. The trial enables diagnosing most of the responders within the first 2 days and thus a shorter duration of therapy may be considered in a subset of non-cardiac chest pain patients.
大剂量奥美拉唑经验性试验已被证明是诊断胃食管反流病相关性非心源性胸痛患者的敏感工具。
确定大剂量兰索拉唑经验性试验在检测胃食管反流病相关性非心源性胸痛患者中的临床价值。
经心脏病专家全面评估后转诊的患者,以每周至少发作三次无法解释的胸痛为主要症状,纳入本研究。通过上消化道内镜检查确定食管黏膜疾病,随后进行24小时食管pH监测以评估酸暴露情况。然后将患者随机分为安慰剂组或兰索拉唑组,兰索拉唑组晨起服用60mg、下午服用30mg,共7天。经过1周的洗脱期后,患者交叉至研究的另一组,再进行7天治疗。患者在整个基线治疗和洗脱期内完成每日日记,评估以胸痛为主要症状的严重程度和发作频率。如果胸痛评分较基线改善≥50%,则认为兰索拉唑经验性试验具有诊断意义。
纳入的40例非心源性胸痛患者中,18例(45%)有糜烂性食管炎和/或pH试验异常(胃食管反流病阳性),22例(55%)两项检查均为阴性(胃食管反流病阴性)。在胃食管反流病阳性患者中,14例(78%)服用兰索拉唑后的症状改善明显高于服用安慰剂的患者(22%)(P = 0.0143)。在胃食管反流病阴性组中,2例(9.1%)用药后明显改善,8例(36.3%)服用安慰剂后改善(P = 0.75)。兰索拉唑经验性试验的敏感性和特异性分别为78%和80%。到第2天,12例(85.7%)胃食管反流病相关性非心源性胸痛缓解患者的症状完全或几乎完全缓解。
兰索拉唑经验性试验对诊断胃食管反流病相关性非心源性胸痛患者具有高度敏感性和特异性。该试验能在头2天内诊断出大多数缓解患者,因此对于一部分非心源性胸痛患者可考虑缩短治疗疗程。