Bigler Erin D, Neeley E Shannon, Miller Michael J, Tate David F, Rice Sara A, Cleavinger Howard, Wolfson Lara, Tschanz Joann, Welsh-Bohmer Kathleen
Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 May;10(3):442-52. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704103111.
There are several magnetic resonance (MR) imaging methods to measure brain volume and cerebral atrophy; however, the best measure for examining potential relationships between such measures and neuropsychological performance has not been established. Relationships between seven measures of MR derived brain volume or indices of atrophy and neuropsychological performance in the elderly subjects of the population-based Cache County, Utah Study of Aging and Memory (n = 195) were evaluated. The seven MR measures included uncorrected total brain volume (TBV), TBV corrected by total intracranial volume (TICV), TBV corrected by the ratio of the individuals TICV by group TICV (TBVC), a ventricle-to-brain ratio (VBR), total ventricular volume (TVV), TVV corrected by TICV, and a measure of parenchymal volume loss. The cases from the Cache County Study were comprised of elderly individuals classified into one of four subject groups based on a consensus diagnostic process, independent of quantitative MR imaging findings. The groups included subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 85), no dementia but mild/ambiguous (M/A) deficits (n = 30), a group of subjects with non-AD dementia or neuropsychiatric disorder including vascular dementia (n = 60), and control subjects (n = 20). Neuropsychological performance was based on the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and an expanded neuropsychological test battery (consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD). The results demonstrated that the various quantitative MR measures were highly interrelated and no single measure was statistically superior. However, TBVC, TBV/TICV and VBR consistently exhibited the more robust relationships with neuropsychological performance. These results suggest that a single corrected brain volume measure or index is sufficient in studies examining global MR indicators of cerebral atrophy in relation to cognitive function and recommends use of either TBVC, TBV/TICV, or VBR.
有几种磁共振(MR)成像方法可用于测量脑容量和脑萎缩;然而,用于检验此类测量与神经心理表现之间潜在关系的最佳测量方法尚未确定。在基于人群的犹他州卡什县衰老与记忆研究(n = 195)的老年受试者中,评估了七种源自MR的脑容量测量方法或萎缩指数与神经心理表现之间的关系。这七种MR测量方法包括未校正的全脑体积(TBV)、通过总颅内体积(TICV)校正的TBV、通过个体TICV与组TICV之比校正的TBV(TBVC)、脑室与脑比率(VBR)、总脑室体积(TVV)、通过TICV校正的TVV以及实质体积损失测量值。卡什县研究的病例包括根据共识诊断过程分为四个受试者组之一的老年人,该过程独立于定量MR成像结果。这些组包括患有阿尔茨海默病(AD,n = 85)的受试者、无痴呆但有轻度/不明确(M/A)缺陷的受试者(n = 30)、一组患有非AD痴呆或神经精神疾病(包括血管性痴呆)的受试者(n = 60)以及对照受试者(n = 20)。神经心理表现基于简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和扩展的神经心理测试组(阿尔茨海默病注册协会(CERAD))。结果表明,各种定量MR测量方法高度相关,没有单一测量方法在统计学上更具优势。然而,TBVC、TBV/TICV和VBR始终与神经心理表现呈现出更强的关系。这些结果表明,在研究脑萎缩的整体MR指标与认知功能的关系时,单一的校正脑容量测量方法或指数就足够了,并建议使用TBVC、TBV/TICV或VBR。