Grossman Zehava, Paxinos Ellen E, Averbuch Diana, Maayan Shlomo, Parkin Neil T, Engelhard Dan, Lorber Margalit, Istomin Valery, Shaked Yael, Mendelson Ella, Ram Daniela, Petropoulos Chris J, Schapiro Jonathan M
National HIV Reference Center, Central Virology Laboratory, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun;48(6):2159-65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2159-2165.2004.
Differences in baseline polymorphisms between subtypes may result in development of diverse mutational pathways during antiretroviral treatment. We compared drug resistance in patients with human immunodeficiency virus subtype C (referred to herein as "subtype-C-infected patients") versus subtype-B-infected patients following protease inhibitor (PI) therapy. Genotype, phenotype, and replication capacity (Phenosense; Virologic) were determined. We evaluated 159 subtype-C- and 65 subtype-B-infected patients failing first PI treatment. Following nelfinavir treatment, the unique nelfinavir mutation D30N was substantially less frequent in C (7%) than in B (23%; P = 0.03) while L90M was similar (P < 0.5). Significant differences were found in the rates of M36I (98 and 36%), L63P (35 and 59%), A71V (3 and 32%), V77I (0 and 36%), and I93L (91 and 32%) (0.0001 < P < 0.05) in C and B, respectively. Other mutations were L10I/V, K20R, M46I, V82A/I, I84V, N88D, and N88S. Subtype C samples with mutation D30N showed a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) change in susceptibility to nelfinavir only. Other mutations increased IC(50) correlates to all PIs. Following accumulation of mutations, replication capacity of the C virus was reduced from 43% +/- 22% to 22% +/- 15% (P = 0.04). We confirmed the selective nature of the D30N mutation in C, and the broader cross-resistance of other common protease inhibitor mutations. The rates at which these mutational pathways develop differ in C and subtype-B-infected patients failing therapy, possibly due to the differential impact of baseline polymorphisms. Because mutation D30N is not preferentially selected in nelfinavir-treated subtype-C-infected patients, as it is in those infected with subtype B, the consideration of using this drug initially to preserve future protease inhibitor options is less relevant for subtype-C-infected patients.
不同亚型之间基线多态性的差异可能导致抗逆转录病毒治疗期间多种突变途径的形成。我们比较了蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)治疗后人类免疫缺陷病毒C亚型患者(以下简称“C亚型感染患者”)与B亚型感染患者的耐药性。测定了基因型、表型和复制能力(Phenosense;病毒学)。我们评估了159例首次PI治疗失败的C亚型感染患者和65例B亚型感染患者。在奈非那韦治疗后,独特的奈非那韦突变D30N在C亚型中的出现频率(7%)显著低于B亚型(23%;P = 0.03),而L90M的出现频率相似(P < 0.5)。在C亚型和B亚型中,M36I(98%和36%)、L63P(35%和59%)、A71V(3%和32%)、V77I(0和36%)以及I93L(91%和32%)的发生率存在显著差异(0.0001 < P < 0.05)。其他突变包括L10I/V、K20R、M46I、V82A/I、I84V、N88D和N88S。携带D30N突变的C亚型样本仅对奈非那韦的敏感性出现50%抑制浓度(IC(50))变化。其他突变使IC(50)与所有PI的相关性增加。在积累突变后,C病毒的复制能力从43%±22%降至22%±15%(P = 0.04)。我们证实了C亚型中D30N突变的选择性,以及其他常见蛋白酶抑制剂突变更广泛的交叉耐药性。在治疗失败的C亚型感染患者和B亚型感染患者中,这些突变途径的发展速率不同,这可能是由于基线多态性的不同影响。由于在接受奈非那韦治疗的C亚型感染患者中,不像在B亚型感染患者中那样优先选择D30N突变,因此对于C亚型感染患者而言,最初考虑使用该药以保留未来蛋白酶抑制剂选择的相关性较低。