Wessel Jean
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):174-80. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.006.
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of hand exercises for persons with rheumatoid arthritis. The databases Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane were used to search for articles on exercise and hand and rheumatoid arthritis (and their synonyms). Any articles that evaluated the effects of exercise on the hand were included in the review and evaluated for quality on a form specifically developed for the reviews in this issue. Only nine studies evaluated the effect of hand exercise or a program that included hand exercise. Quality scores ranged from 21 to 39 out of a possible 48. Few studies used psychometrically sound measures or reported on changes to everyday function. Although some significant results were obtained, they may have been due to multiple outcome measures, lack of blinding, and within-group rather than between-group comparisons. Impairment and dexterity were frequent outcomes, but measurement of self-report function was lacking. Long-term exercise may increase strength, but results on range of motion are inconsistent across studies, subjects, and joints. There is a need for randomized controlled trials with goal-specific exercise, measurement of outcomes appropriate to the goals, adequate sample size, and comparison with an appropriate control condition.
进行了一项系统评价,以评估手部锻炼对类风湿性关节炎患者的疗效。使用了医学文献数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引数据库(CINAHL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、循证医学数据库(PEDro)和考克兰图书馆,检索关于锻炼与手部及类风湿性关节炎(及其同义词)的文章。任何评估锻炼对手部影响的文章均纳入该评价,并使用专门为本刊评价制定的表格评估其质量。只有9项研究评估了手部锻炼或包含手部锻炼的项目的效果。质量得分在可能的48分中为21至39分。很少有研究使用心理测量学上合理的测量方法或报告日常功能的变化。尽管取得了一些显著结果,但这些结果可能归因于多种结局测量、缺乏盲法以及组内而非组间比较。损伤和灵活性是常见的结局,但缺乏自我报告功能的测量。长期锻炼可能会增强力量,但关于活动范围的结果在不同研究、受试者和关节之间并不一致。需要进行随机对照试验,采用目标明确的锻炼方法,测量与目标相适应的结局,有足够的样本量,并与适当的对照条件进行比较。