评论：激素替代疗法与冠心病之谜：这是否意味着观察性流行病学的终结？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Commentary: the hormone replacement-coronary heart disease conundrum: is this the death of observational epidemiology?

作者信息

Lawlor Debbie A, Davey Smith George, Ebrahim Shah

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):464-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh124. Epub 2004 May 27.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyh124

PMID:15166201

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Commentary: the hormone replacement-coronary heart disease conundrum: is this the death of observational epidemiology?评论：激素替代疗法与冠心病之谜：这是否意味着观察性流行病学的终结？

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):464-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh124. Epub 2004 May 27.

Commentary: hormones and heart disease: do trials and observational studies address different questions?评论：激素与心脏病：试验研究和观察性研究探讨的是不同问题吗？

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):454-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh191. Epub 2004 May 27.

Commentary: hazards of studying women: the oestrogen oestrogen/progesterone dilemma.评论：研究女性的风险：雌激素/孕激素困境

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):459-60. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh122. Epub 2004 May 27.

Commentary: observation versus intervention--what's different?评论：观察与干预——有何不同？

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):457-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh123. Epub 2004 May 27.

Cardiovascular risk and hormone replacement therapy.心血管风险与激素替代疗法。

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;18(6):658-65. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32800ff5af.

Commentary: hormone replacement therapy and coronary heart disease: four lessons.评论：激素替代疗法与冠心病：四点启示。

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):461-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh192. Epub 2004 May 27.

Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease: increased risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke, and no protection from coronary heart disease.激素替代疗法与心血管疾病：静脉血栓栓塞和中风风险增加，对冠心病无保护作用。

J Intern Med. 2004 Nov;256(5):361-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01400.x.

Commentary: hormones, heart disease, and the definition of hormone 'initiation'.

Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;35(3):738-9; discussion 740. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl039. Epub 2006 Mar 31.

Coronary heart disease in menopausal women: implications of primary and secondary prevention trials of hormones.绝经后女性的冠心病：激素一级和二级预防试验的启示

Maturitas. 2005 May 16;51(1):51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.02.015.

Current evidence about the effect of hormone replacement therapy on the incidence of major conditions in postmenopausal women.关于激素替代疗法对绝经后女性主要疾病发病率影响的当前证据。

BJOG. 2005 Jun;112(6):692-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00541.x.

引用本文的文献

PRECIOUS study (PREterm Caesarean/vaginal birth and IVH/OUtcomeS): does mode of birth reduce the risk of death or brain injury in very preterm babies? A cohort and emulated target trial protocol.珍贵研究（早产剖宫产/阴道分娩和 IVH/结局）：分娩方式是否降低极早产儿的死亡或脑损伤风险？一项队列研究和模拟目标试验方案。

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e089722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089722.

Genetically predicted sex hormone binding globulin and ischemic heart disease in men and women: a univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study.基于遗传预测的性激素结合球蛋白与男性和女性的缺血性心脏病：单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化研究。

Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 30;11(1):23172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02510-w.

The replication crisis in epidemiology: snowball, snow job, or winter solstice?流行病学中的复制危机：滚雪球、骗局还是冬至？

Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Jun;5(2):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0148-x. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization.进行孟德尔随机化的常用方法。

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 May 28;5:51. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00051. eCollection 2018.

Genetic instrumental variable regression: Explaining socioeconomic and health outcomes in nonexperimental data.遗传工具变量回归：在非实验数据中解释社会经济和健康结果。

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 29;115(22):E4970-E4979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707388115. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

Needle and syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing HCV transmission among people who inject drugs: findings from a Cochrane Review and meta-analysis.针具和注射器方案以及阿片类药物替代疗法预防注射吸毒人群中 HCV 传播的效果：一项 Cochrane 综述和荟萃分析的结果。

Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):545-563. doi: 10.1111/add.14012. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

How to compare instrumental variable and conventional regression analyses using negative controls and bias plots.如何使用负对照和偏差图比较工具变量分析和常规回归分析。

Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):2067-2077. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx014.

A systematic literature review on the efficacy-effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs.关于疗效-效果差距的系统文献综述：降糖药物随机对照试验与观察性研究的比较

Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 23;9:41-51. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S121991. eCollection 2017.

Directed dynamical influence is more detectable with noise.有噪声时，定向动态影响更易被检测到。

Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 12;6:24088. doi: 10.1038/srep24088.

Observational and clinical trial findings on the comparative effectiveness of diabetes drugs showed agreement.关于糖尿病药物相对疗效的观察性研究和临床试验结果显示出一致性。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):200-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验