Meltzer Herbert Y, Arvanitis Lisa, Bauer Deborah, Rein Werner
Psychiatric Hospital at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;161(6):975-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.975.
Four studies using identical protocols evaluated the safety and efficacy of four novel, evidence-based targets for antipsychotic agents: a neurokinin (NK(3)) antagonist (SR142801), a serotonin 2A/2C (5-HT(2A/2C)) antagonist (SR46349B), a central cannabinoid (CB(1)) antagonist (SR141716), and a neurotensin (NTS(1)) antagonist (SR48692).
Adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N=481) were randomly assigned in a 3:1:1 ratio to receive fixed doses of investigational drug, placebo, or haloperidol for 6 weeks. Primary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, severity of illness score on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and total score and psychosis cluster score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).
Significantly greater improvement in all primary efficacy variables was seen in the group receiving haloperidol than in the group receiving placebo at 6 weeks (endpoint analyses), indicating the validity of the study. The group receiving the NK(3) antagonist showed significantly greater improvement over baseline than the group receiving placebo as measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, CGI severity of illness score, and BPRS psychosis cluster score. Reductions in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and negative scores in the group receiving the 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonist were significantly larger than those in the group receiving placebo. The improvements in psychopathology produced by the NK(3) and 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonists were smaller than those produced by haloperidol, although the response to the NK(3) antagonist was positively correlated with plasma levels. The groups receiving the CB(1) and NTS(1) antagonists did not differ from the group receiving placebo on any outcome measure. All investigational drugs were well tolerated.
The novel design used in this study permitted the use of a smaller number of patients receiving placebo to test the efficacy of the four novel compounds. The NK(3) and 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonists showed evidence of efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Study limitations preclude a definitive conclusion on the efficacy of CB(1) and NTS(1) antagonists in the treatment of schizophrenia. Further study of these two promising nondopaminergic mechanisms to treat schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder appears indicated.
四项采用相同方案的研究评估了四种新型、循证抗精神病药物靶点的安全性和有效性:一种神经激肽(NK(3))拮抗剂(SR142801)、一种5-羟色胺2A/2C(5-HT(2A/2C))拮抗剂(SR46349B)、一种中枢大麻素(CB(1))拮抗剂(SR141716)以及一种神经降压素(NTS(1))拮抗剂(SR48692)。
患有精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍的成人(N = 481)按3:1:1的比例随机分组,接受固定剂量的研究药物、安慰剂或氟哌啶醇治疗6周。主要疗效变量包括阳性和阴性症状量表总分相对于基线的变化、临床总体印象(CGI)的病情严重程度评分以及简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)的总分和精神病症状群评分。
在6周时(终点分析),接受氟哌啶醇治疗的组在所有主要疗效变量上的改善均显著大于接受安慰剂治疗的组,表明该研究有效。接受NK(3)拮抗剂治疗的组在阳性和阴性症状量表总分、CGI病情严重程度评分以及BPRS精神病症状群评分方面相对于基线的改善显著大于接受安慰剂治疗的组。接受5-HT(2A/2C)拮抗剂治疗的组在阳性和阴性症状量表总分及阴性评分方面的降低幅度显著大于接受安慰剂治疗的组。NK(3)和5-HT(2A/2C)拮抗剂产生的精神病理学改善小于氟哌啶醇产生的改善,尽管对NK(3)拮抗剂的反应与血浆水平呈正相关。接受CB(1)和NTS(1)拮抗剂治疗的组在任何结局指标上与接受安慰剂治疗的组均无差异。所有研究药物耐受性良好。
本研究中使用的新颖设计允许使用较少数量接受安慰剂治疗的患者来测试这四种新型化合物的疗效。NK(3)和5-HT(2A/2C)拮抗剂显示出治疗精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的疗效证据。研究局限性妨碍就CB(1)和NTS(1)拮抗剂治疗精神分裂症的疗效得出明确结论。似乎需要对这两种有前景的非多巴胺能机制治疗精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍进行进一步研究。