Shatzman Keren B, Schiller Niels O
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):160-9. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00429-2.
Models of speech production disagree on whether or not homonyms have a shared word-form representation. To investigate this issue, a picture-naming experiment was carried out using Dutch homonyms of which both meanings could be presented as a picture. Naming latencies for the low-frequency meanings of homonyms were slower than for those of the high-frequency meanings. However, no frequency effect was found for control words, which matched the frequency of the homonyms' meanings. Subsequent control experiments indicated that the difference in naming latencies for the homonyms could be attributed to processes earlier than word-form retrieval. Specifically, it appears that low name agreement slowed down the naming of the low-frequency homonym pictures.
言语产生模型对于同形同音异义词是否具有共享的词形表征存在分歧。为了研究这个问题,我们使用了荷兰语同形同音异义词进行了一项图片命名实验,这些词的两种含义都可以呈现为图片。同形同音异义词低频含义的命名潜伏期比高频含义的命名潜伏期要长。然而,对于与同形同音异义词含义频率相匹配的控制词,未发现频率效应。随后的控制实验表明,同形同音异义词命名潜伏期的差异可归因于早于词形检索的过程。具体而言,似乎低命名一致性减缓了低频同形同音异义词图片的命名。