Nosaka Kazunori, Sakamoto Kei, Newton Mike, Sacco Paul
Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia.
J Athl Train. 2004 Jun;39(2):132-137.
We tested the hypothesis that altering the pre-exercise muscle temperature would influence the magnitude of muscle damage induced by eccentric exercise. SUBJECTS: Female students who had no experience in resistance training were placed into either a microwave treatment group (n = 10) or an icing treatment group (n = 10). DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects in each group performed 12 maximal eccentric actions of the forearm flexors of each arm on 2 separate occasions separated by 4 weeks. Before testing, the exercise arm was subjected to either passive warming (microwave) or control for the microwave treatment group or cooling (icing) or control for the icing treatment group. The control arm performed the same exercise protocol without treatment. Limbs were randomized for treatment or control and order of testing. Deep muscle temperature increased by approximately 3 degrees C after the microwave treatment and decreased approximately 5 degrees C after the icing treatment. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated changes in maximal isometric force and indirect markers of muscle damage, including range of motion, upper arm circumference, muscle soreness, and plasma creatine kinase activity, in the microwave and control and icing and control groups using a 2-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All measures changed significantly (P <.01) after exercise, but neither of the treatments demonstrated significant effects on most of the variables compared with the control. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pre-exercise cooling does not affect the magnitude of muscle damage in response to eccentric exercise. Similarly, pre-exercise passive muscle warming did not prove beneficial in attenuating indicators of muscle damage. Thus, any beneficial effects of warm-up exercise cannot be attributed to the effects of increased muscle temperature.
我们检验了这样一个假设,即改变运动前肌肉温度会影响离心运动诱导的肌肉损伤程度。
将没有抗阻训练经验的女学生分为微波治疗组(n = 10)或冰敷治疗组(n = 10)。
每组受试者在相隔4周的2个不同时间,对每只手臂的前臂屈肌进行12次最大离心动作。在测试前,对微波治疗组的运动手臂进行被动加热(微波)或对照,对冰敷治疗组进行冷却(冰敷)或对照。对照手臂进行相同的运动方案但不进行治疗。肢体随机分配接受治疗或对照以及测试顺序。微波治疗后深部肌肉温度升高约3℃,冰敷治疗后降低约5℃。
我们使用双向重复测量方差分析,评估微波组与对照组、冰敷组与对照组中最大等长力量的变化以及肌肉损伤的间接指标,包括关节活动范围、上臂围、肌肉酸痛和血浆肌酸激酶活性。
运动后所有测量指标均有显著变化(P <.01),但与对照组相比,两种治疗方法对大多数变量均未显示出显著影响。
这些结果表明,运动前冷却不会影响离心运动引起的肌肉损伤程度。同样,运动前被动肌肉加热在减轻肌肉损伤指标方面也未被证明有益。因此,热身运动的任何有益效果都不能归因于肌肉温度升高的影响。