MacKenzie R K, Allan P L, Ruckley C V, Bradbury A W
Vascular Surgery Unit, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Jul;28(1):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.009.
The addition of long saphenous vein (LSV) stripping to sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) disconnection and multiple stab avulsions (MSAs) in the course of varicose vein (VV) surgery is associated with a significant reduction in recurrence, and a significant improvement in quality of life. It is hypothesised that these benefits relate, at least in part, to a favourable effect of stripping on deep venous reflux.
To examine the effect of long saphenous vein (LSV) stripping on deep venous reflux (DVR).
This was prospective study of 62 consecutive patients (77 limbs) CEAP class 2-6, undergoing SFJ disconnection and MSAs, with and without successful stripping of the LSV to the knee. A duplex ultrasound examination was performed pre-operatively and at a median (IQR) of 24 (23-25) months post-operatively. Completely stripped limbs were defined as those in whom complete stripping of the LSV to the knee was confirmed on post-operative duplex. Reflux >/=0.5 s. was considered pathological.
Pre-operatively, 32 (42%) limbs had deep venous reflux (DVR). Post-operative duplex at 24 months revealed that the LSV had been completely stripped in 29 (38%) limbs. In patients with pre-operative DVR, complete stripping was associated with a significant reduction in the prevalence of superficial femoral vein (SFV) (p<0.001) and popliteal vein (PV) (p=0.016), McNemar test) on post-operative duplex. By contrast, in patients without pre-operative DVR, incomplete stripping was associated the development of SFV (p=0.031) and PV (p=0.008) reflux.
Complete LSV stripping abolishes DVR in a significant proportion of limbs, whereas failure to strip is frequently associated with the development of new DVR. These data support for routine stripping and suggest that the benefits of stripping may relate, at least in part, to a favourable impact on deep venous function.
在大隐静脉曲张(VV)手术过程中,在进行大隐静脉-股静脉交界处(SFJ)离断和多处点状剥脱术(MSAs)的基础上增加大隐静脉(LSV)剥脱术,可显著降低复发率,并显著改善生活质量。据推测,这些益处至少部分与剥脱术对深静脉反流的有利影响有关。
研究大隐静脉(LSV)剥脱术对深静脉反流(DVR)的影响。
这是一项前瞻性研究,连续纳入62例(77条肢体)CEAP 2-6级患者,接受SFJ离断和MSAs手术,其中部分患者成功将LSV剥脱至膝关节水平。术前及术后中位时间(四分位间距)24(23-25)个月进行双功超声检查。完全剥脱的肢体定义为术后双功超声证实LSV已完全剥脱至膝关节的肢体。反流≥0.5秒被视为病理性反流。
术前,32条(42%)肢体存在深静脉反流(DVR)。术后24个月的双功超声显示,29条(38%)肢体的LSV已完全剥脱。在术前有DVR的患者中,完全剥脱与术后双功超声检查时股浅静脉(SFV)(p<0.001)和腘静脉(PV)(p=0.016,McNemar检验)反流发生率的显著降低相关。相比之下,在术前无DVR的患者中,不完全剥脱与SFV(p=0.031)和PV(p=0.008)反流的发生相关。
完全剥脱LSV可使相当比例的肢体消除DVR,而未能剥脱则常与新的DVR形成相关。这些数据支持常规剥脱术,并表明剥脱术的益处至少部分与对深静脉功能的有利影响有关。